I stopped off at my local gunshop (Kittery Trading Post in Kittery, Maine) tonight to see if they had any Hogue or Pachmahr grips for my GP100....
While I was there, I stopped off at the used handgun counter, specifically, the single-action counter, perusing the guns, I've always loved the crisp feel of a single-action trigger, I'm not really a fan of DA in either revolver or semi
As I scanned the guns in the counter, one called out to me....
a blued Ruger New Model Blackhawk, in .45 Long Colt/.45ACP!, it had nice ?maple? grips on it, and was in great shape, aside from the ubiquitous turn line that all revolvers get, lockup was solid, the trigger was light and crisp (and tasty
), it had the long 6" barrel, the grips were a *tad* short for my wide palms, but I also checked out a Pachmahr gripped .357 NMBH, and those grips fit better, so grips are really a non-issue here, it pointed well, not as truly instinctive as my GP, but that's probably because I have never shot a full-size SA revolver before and I'm probably not gripping it right....
I'm tempted by this NMBH, *seriously* tempted, to the point that I'm considering trading back my GP100 for the NMBH .45.....
the .45 has a lot of advantages to me, I love single-actions, I love the clicky noise the loading gate and cylinder makes when spun, heck, I even like the slower pace of one-at-a-time loading/unloading, takes me back to simpler times, but most importantly, the *REAL* reason I'm tempted by the NMBH......
I reload for my Kimber 1911 .45 ACP, which means I *ALREADY HAVE AMMO* for it, it also means I won't have to stock another caliber or two (.357/.38Spl), and considering that .357/.38 is *impossible* to find in my area, (KTP has bulk .38SPL +P but it's more than I want to pay, and i really prefer shooting .357 in a .357)
then again, I *love* how overbuilt the GP100 is, it looks and feels indestructible, it's modular and easy to break down for detail cleaning, and it's quicker to unload/load
that said, I'm seriously tempted by the NMBH .45
Which gun is more rugged/durable, the GP100 or the NMBH?
Advantages of the GP;
I already own it
Overbuilt construction
*this one* has a trigger that's smoother than a S&W 686 in both SA and DA
points naturally
Stainless
Disadvantages of the GP100
Ammo is difficult/impossible to find right now
.357 is a painful round to shoot (shockwave/muzzleblast and recoil), admittedly, I haven't shot the GP yet, but I have shot .357 in the Taurus 689 I used to have, that was an unpleasant experience
I have to stock two new calibers in my ammo stores
Advantages of the NMBH .45
I already have plenty of ammo for it (I reload .45ACP) and have a decent amount of components to build more ammo
I've heard good things about .45LC and would love to try it, all I'd need is a set of dies for my press to reload for .45LC
I love the clicky sounds it makes when loading and drawing the hammer back
SA is a simpler internal design, less to go wrong, easier to fix in the field/at the range if something does go wrong
Disadvantages of the NMBH .45
I don't own one yet
Single action makes it less useful as a personal defense weapon, but that's what my 1911 would be for
6" barrel makes it hard to carry around just to have on me, but then again, the 1911 fills that role
since the GP100 would just be a range toy anyway, I think I'd have more fun with a range toy I can actually shoot, and have sufficient ammo stocks for....
So, trade the GP for the NMBH, or keep the GP, I'm not financially able to own both at the moment
Simply put, the only thing making me consider keeping the GP100 is the "overbuilt" feel of it, I love things that are built to last
While I was there, I stopped off at the used handgun counter, specifically, the single-action counter, perusing the guns, I've always loved the crisp feel of a single-action trigger, I'm not really a fan of DA in either revolver or semi
As I scanned the guns in the counter, one called out to me....
a blued Ruger New Model Blackhawk, in .45 Long Colt/.45ACP!, it had nice ?maple? grips on it, and was in great shape, aside from the ubiquitous turn line that all revolvers get, lockup was solid, the trigger was light and crisp (and tasty
I'm tempted by this NMBH, *seriously* tempted, to the point that I'm considering trading back my GP100 for the NMBH .45.....
the .45 has a lot of advantages to me, I love single-actions, I love the clicky noise the loading gate and cylinder makes when spun, heck, I even like the slower pace of one-at-a-time loading/unloading, takes me back to simpler times, but most importantly, the *REAL* reason I'm tempted by the NMBH......
I reload for my Kimber 1911 .45 ACP, which means I *ALREADY HAVE AMMO* for it, it also means I won't have to stock another caliber or two (.357/.38Spl), and considering that .357/.38 is *impossible* to find in my area, (KTP has bulk .38SPL +P but it's more than I want to pay, and i really prefer shooting .357 in a .357)
then again, I *love* how overbuilt the GP100 is, it looks and feels indestructible, it's modular and easy to break down for detail cleaning, and it's quicker to unload/load
that said, I'm seriously tempted by the NMBH .45
Which gun is more rugged/durable, the GP100 or the NMBH?
Advantages of the GP;
I already own it
Overbuilt construction
*this one* has a trigger that's smoother than a S&W 686 in both SA and DA
points naturally
Stainless
Disadvantages of the GP100
Ammo is difficult/impossible to find right now
.357 is a painful round to shoot (shockwave/muzzleblast and recoil), admittedly, I haven't shot the GP yet, but I have shot .357 in the Taurus 689 I used to have, that was an unpleasant experience
I have to stock two new calibers in my ammo stores
Advantages of the NMBH .45
I already have plenty of ammo for it (I reload .45ACP) and have a decent amount of components to build more ammo
I've heard good things about .45LC and would love to try it, all I'd need is a set of dies for my press to reload for .45LC
I love the clicky sounds it makes when loading and drawing the hammer back
SA is a simpler internal design, less to go wrong, easier to fix in the field/at the range if something does go wrong
Disadvantages of the NMBH .45
I don't own one yet
Single action makes it less useful as a personal defense weapon, but that's what my 1911 would be for
6" barrel makes it hard to carry around just to have on me, but then again, the 1911 fills that role
since the GP100 would just be a range toy anyway, I think I'd have more fun with a range toy I can actually shoot, and have sufficient ammo stocks for....
So, trade the GP for the NMBH, or keep the GP, I'm not financially able to own both at the moment
Simply put, the only thing making me consider keeping the GP100 is the "overbuilt" feel of it, I love things that are built to last