Sharps40
Buckeye
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2014
- Messages
- 1,018
Chingachgook.....Last of the Mohicans.
1893 Marlin. Smokeless steel barrel. 3030. Reblued. Rifle butt, steel. Wood refinished. Good + bore. Tight as nearly new.
Issues.
Replacement Rocky Mountain Front sight. This would NOT have been the original front sight as the gun was factory equipped with the LL Hepburn receiver sight. Though initially installed backwards and now on correctly, it is to low for a receiver sight in any event....it would be correct for a rifle issued with barrel rear sight only. Correct blade with the Hepburn would likely have been a lyman/marbles style in much taller size, probably about .5 or so tall....this blade is about .340 for rear barrel sight only. So.....the front sight will be replaced, hopefully with something classy and of a compromise size to work with barrel and receiver sight.
A blank was replaced with a marlin folding rear and will be replaced again, with luck, a period style barrel rear sight that folds, does not mark the reblued and serves as a second sighting system and a snap shooting system for close/running shooting and for when the twilight or canopy make the peep useless in the woods. i.e. a fast handling point blank to 50-100 yard sight.
The LL Hepburn receiver sight is long gone and $250+ to replace it. The holes in the bridge are factory for the Hepburn sight. There will be no more holes drilled in the gun....no matter what. While the attached peep is well made and looks nice, it is a moderately expensive means to hamstring the utility of a fine fast handling rifle. It leaves absolutely zero windage capability out back. It does not allow for rapid removal and reinstallation to use the barrel sight. It provides only the coarsest of elevation adjustments, on the order of 2" to 3" of movement at 100 yards for each half turn of the stem. And finally, it requires a taller front sight anyway, on the order of .6-.7". If we need a front sight that high, it better be good looking.
The "receiver sight" currently on the gun, less than desirable when considering functionality.
For LESS money and free shipping (use yer google foo), than the attached peep cost, a fully functional sight from a company that made receiver sights way back when was located. In addition, for a touch more, a front sight blank, already well cut out was rounded up. Barrel sight is on the way. We'll see if it'll all work later after measurements are made and calculations completed.
Oh yeah, when selecting one of these receiver sights it is NOT necessary to select one for an 1893 marlin. Since we'll not be drilling holes, any flat side sight of suitable old style construction that provides full function will be fine. Shop by period, price, alloy or steel, but shop and select a sight that complements the rifle and its uses instead of "cutting off" one or more of its legs.
Shown below is a Lyman 66U for fat body Shotguns. But it was selected for two reasons, it cost less shipped (new in box) than the handicapping receiver sight shown above and with its "Shotgun" design, it has a thin body, which effectively produces a "longer" cross arm on the skinny bridge of the Marlin (as compaied to the fat bridge of a pump shotgun) A sturdy steel mount will be made up, using the factory Hepburn sight mounting holes and the cross arm will then center as if its skinny side was made for the marlin instead of the fat shotgun.
This period style sight can be zeroed for favorite load, adjusted in a flash to any longer ranges and completely installed and removed in seconds as dictated by the hunter and the situation.....versatile.
Lots of words right above there....it'll make sense as we go.....probably spilling the beans to early. But, in the end, I hope to have two period style sighting systems, bot providing full windage and elevation adjustments to maximize what is a rifle deserving of maximization.
1893 Marlin. Smokeless steel barrel. 3030. Reblued. Rifle butt, steel. Wood refinished. Good + bore. Tight as nearly new.
Issues.
Replacement Rocky Mountain Front sight. This would NOT have been the original front sight as the gun was factory equipped with the LL Hepburn receiver sight. Though initially installed backwards and now on correctly, it is to low for a receiver sight in any event....it would be correct for a rifle issued with barrel rear sight only. Correct blade with the Hepburn would likely have been a lyman/marbles style in much taller size, probably about .5 or so tall....this blade is about .340 for rear barrel sight only. So.....the front sight will be replaced, hopefully with something classy and of a compromise size to work with barrel and receiver sight.
A blank was replaced with a marlin folding rear and will be replaced again, with luck, a period style barrel rear sight that folds, does not mark the reblued and serves as a second sighting system and a snap shooting system for close/running shooting and for when the twilight or canopy make the peep useless in the woods. i.e. a fast handling point blank to 50-100 yard sight.
The LL Hepburn receiver sight is long gone and $250+ to replace it. The holes in the bridge are factory for the Hepburn sight. There will be no more holes drilled in the gun....no matter what. While the attached peep is well made and looks nice, it is a moderately expensive means to hamstring the utility of a fine fast handling rifle. It leaves absolutely zero windage capability out back. It does not allow for rapid removal and reinstallation to use the barrel sight. It provides only the coarsest of elevation adjustments, on the order of 2" to 3" of movement at 100 yards for each half turn of the stem. And finally, it requires a taller front sight anyway, on the order of .6-.7". If we need a front sight that high, it better be good looking.
The "receiver sight" currently on the gun, less than desirable when considering functionality.
For LESS money and free shipping (use yer google foo), than the attached peep cost, a fully functional sight from a company that made receiver sights way back when was located. In addition, for a touch more, a front sight blank, already well cut out was rounded up. Barrel sight is on the way. We'll see if it'll all work later after measurements are made and calculations completed.
Oh yeah, when selecting one of these receiver sights it is NOT necessary to select one for an 1893 marlin. Since we'll not be drilling holes, any flat side sight of suitable old style construction that provides full function will be fine. Shop by period, price, alloy or steel, but shop and select a sight that complements the rifle and its uses instead of "cutting off" one or more of its legs.
Shown below is a Lyman 66U for fat body Shotguns. But it was selected for two reasons, it cost less shipped (new in box) than the handicapping receiver sight shown above and with its "Shotgun" design, it has a thin body, which effectively produces a "longer" cross arm on the skinny bridge of the Marlin (as compaied to the fat bridge of a pump shotgun) A sturdy steel mount will be made up, using the factory Hepburn sight mounting holes and the cross arm will then center as if its skinny side was made for the marlin instead of the fat shotgun.
This period style sight can be zeroed for favorite load, adjusted in a flash to any longer ranges and completely installed and removed in seconds as dictated by the hunter and the situation.....versatile.
Lots of words right above there....it'll make sense as we go.....probably spilling the beans to early. But, in the end, I hope to have two period style sighting systems, bot providing full windage and elevation adjustments to maximize what is a rifle deserving of maximization.