bradford
Bearcat
I have big bore guns but want a .22 for target shooting (playing not compition) at the range. Are the accuracys of both of these guns about the same. What about the guns resale value? I was thinking of the Mark III hunter.
hutchman":1698qv3v said:There is a lot of MKIII hate on these forums for some reason.
hutchman":1698qv3v said:If you do not like some of the added safety features of the MKIII, they can be bypassed and you end up with a MKIII that is functionally the same as a MKII.
WyoGunner":2vb7jb44 said:It functions pretty well now and I really like the gun, but if you want to avoid all of this, maybe you should consider a Browning buckmark. I hope I can find my hardhat.... I may need some protection from all the rocks people are going to throw for this one :lol:
Leucoandro said:I really like the buckmarks myself. I bought my father a Buckmark Camper. Sad thing though. On the Campers, the rear sight base and front sight are now made out of plastic. The plastic rear sight base is apparently easy to break. I bought the metal parts to replace it from Browning, but it cost more than $60.
WyoGunner":25ua1dqt said:Leucoandro":25ua1dqt said:I really like the buckmarks myself. I bought my father a Buckmark Camper. Sad thing though. On the Campers, the rear sight base and front sight are now made out of plastic. The plastic rear sight base is apparently easy to break. I bought the metal parts to replace it from Browning, but it cost more than $60.
I am really not a fan of all this plastic crap! It is getting progressively harder to find a firearm that doesn't have any in it.
tomiswho said:From "The Graduate" 1967:
Mr. McGuire: I want to say one word to you. Just one word.
Benjamin: Yes, sir.
Mr. McGuire: Are you listening?
Benjamin: Yes, I am.
Mr. McGuire: Plastics.
Benjamin: Just how do you mean that, sir?
WyoGunner":1pll7868 said:The mark III will most likely give you some problems.