After having looked closely at both of these and now have one of each, I see a glaring error in my logic. I mounted the FF3 on the rail of one pistol and the FF2 on a Burris rear sight dovetail on the other.
Just for information purposes, this was bass-ackwards. The FF2 requires removing the sight from the base for changing the battery. When you do this on the dovetail mount, everything comes apart requiring a complete start over with zeroing.
It's mounted so I'll run both as is until the FF2 battery gets weak and then do a complete swap. Putting the FF2 on the rail base(changing the battery is less likely to seriously affect zero since the base stays locked on the rail) and the FF3 on the dovetail base(changing the battery won't affect zero).
FWIW
I don't see any real reason to buy a FF2 since the current cost is equal to FF3 and the battery change thing is a fairly significant disadvantage. I bought the FF2 at 1/2 the price of the FF3 so seemed a logical compromise.
Just for information purposes, this was bass-ackwards. The FF2 requires removing the sight from the base for changing the battery. When you do this on the dovetail mount, everything comes apart requiring a complete start over with zeroing.
It's mounted so I'll run both as is until the FF2 battery gets weak and then do a complete swap. Putting the FF2 on the rail base(changing the battery is less likely to seriously affect zero since the base stays locked on the rail) and the FF3 on the dovetail base(changing the battery won't affect zero).
FWIW
I don't see any real reason to buy a FF2 since the current cost is equal to FF3 and the battery change thing is a fairly significant disadvantage. I bought the FF2 at 1/2 the price of the FF3 so seemed a logical compromise.