roaddog28
Single-Sixer
Like I said in my earlier post, the BH can handle mega loads of ammo where the 586/686 can't. Nothing wrong with the 686 I have one too and like the revolver. I also agree on the model 27. I have a model 28 and it can handle any 357 round you want and can shoot lots of them. So can the GP100. But for shear strength the BH is the revolver.VAdoublegunner":35zkzxcx said:I shoot some monster 180gr .357 Mag handloads in my Blackhawk. While my 686 (or 586 or 681) will handle them, I wouldn't want to shoot a whole lot of them in the L-frame.
It's not that I think the L-frame is weak in that regard. It's just that monster level loads are likely to wear on it sooner. The substantial cylinder mass, frame, bearing surfaces and lockwork of the BH seem better able to withstand continued use of heavy loads. Plus there is that single action ruggedness.
For standard level .357 Mag loads, the L-frame will handle all you want to shoot for as long as you want to shoot it. It was designed to overcome the weakness of the K-frame .357s. However, I wouldn't hesitate to use anything in my Model 27 N-frame that I would use in a Ruger BH. The N-frame is a very robust revolver. Early .357 Mag loads that were developed for use in the N-frames make todays hot loads look like plinkers.
And for $300 for a stainless BH, it's a no brainer (although I did get a really great condition S&W 681 last year for $250 -- yep, that was a no brainer too!)
Summary: Home defense: 686. Backpacking, woods and hunting the BH is the winner.
roaddog28