I STRONGLY suggest you try to shoot a gun like the hunter with the scope before you buy one. I am a pretty good sized guy (6'3" with ape like arms) and for me the Leupold scope can not be mounted to the rear far enough for me to get a good field of view. The scopes do have some adjustment but not enough for me.
I use the scope on the Super Redhawk where I can mount the scope about 4 inches or more to the rear compared to the blackhawk hunter. I am going to try a red dot scope next on my 45 Colt Hunter that I want to use for deer but I also know that the Burris scopes have a reputation of working better because of eye relief.
I love leupold scopes, just because the ring cuts are so far forward you really need to look at the eye reliief or you could be very unhappy with how well it works for you. Still, it does work, but boy can I tell the difference between the full field as I get on the Super Redhawk as compared to the limited field I get on the Blackhawk hunter or Redhawk R models with the same scope model. When hunting, it is hard enough finding the deer in the scope without fighting to find the field of view as well.
Just my oppinion and I am no expert but I have struggled with this and this year I will carry a revolver for deer without a scope because of these problems.