Cheesewhiz
Hunter
There have been a few posts lately about accessory rails on pistols, my opinion has been up and down on this subject. Most new model guns look and function fine with them but only a few of the older gun designs adapt well to the addition of one.
I have quite a few pistols that have rails on them but I don't mount lights or lasers on them (I have one gun with a laser but it has a laser grip, a CZ P-01).
The heavier weight of the rail on the CZ SP-01 (pictured below right) helps a lot with muzzle flip during rapid fire, in comparision with a CZ 75B and makes it one of the best production guns for doing this, so in this case I see it as a positive
There are some guns that IMO should not have a rail incorporated into it and a fine example of that is the 1911, the added weight will not be under the muzzle, so I see no functional benefit and it just looks plain ugly on that great gun.
I might just be an almost old fuddy duddy but what are your opinions?
I have quite a few pistols that have rails on them but I don't mount lights or lasers on them (I have one gun with a laser but it has a laser grip, a CZ P-01).
The heavier weight of the rail on the CZ SP-01 (pictured below right) helps a lot with muzzle flip during rapid fire, in comparision with a CZ 75B and makes it one of the best production guns for doing this, so in this case I see it as a positive
There are some guns that IMO should not have a rail incorporated into it and a fine example of that is the 1911, the added weight will not be under the muzzle, so I see no functional benefit and it just looks plain ugly on that great gun.
I might just be an almost old fuddy duddy but what are your opinions?