MMichaelAK
Single-Sixer
six of one, a half dozen of another.
I prefer the .45 Colt. Over 120 years old and still stopping anything you point it at.
I prefer the .45 Colt. Over 120 years old and still stopping anything you point it at.
gobe":3rmonepi said:I'm talking using 'store-bought' ammo. Which would be the more powerful handgun; .45LC or .44 Mag?
Not to beat a dead horse "too" much but "I beg to differ sir". I'd imagine that the decades old loading manuals with "Ruger only" data didn't just throw it out there at the dewey cheeked masses without thorough testing and without their lawyer's CYA in mind. It's been know pretty much since it's 1970 (I think) debut that a .45 Blackhawk will handle 25K with ease and some such as Linebaugh put that limit at around 32K for a lifetime and that's with a 100% safety margin. We all know that Elmer's timeless reference to "a weak .45 Colt case" involved "A" weak folded head case. (Likely compromised by black powder corrosion and old age too. I doubt Elmer was throwing any cases away in the depression unless he had to) I'm somewhat conservative too and feel no urge to push a 325 gr .45 much over 1200 fps. Nothing walks this continent that can soak up a solid hit from that load and live long. Yet many savvy reloaders feel no qualms at going for 1400! The fact remains that a .45 BH will safely do anything the .44 SBH will at less pressure. Rein in a .45 Ruger BH or RH to 13 or 14K? Whatever for! Rick, were you TRYING to rattle we .45 Colt fans? :lol: Best regards, DennisRick Courtright":xkd8maom said:From an objective standpoint, I'm rather conservative. The .44 Mag is built from the ground up to handle the higher pressures. Because of the nature of the cartridge and guns built around it, I doubt you'll find a gun mfr who will ok .45 Colt loads above SAAMI specs. So, while it's pretty well agreed "on the street" that some .45s can handle near .44 Mag pressures, the pressure issue MAY become important depending on the launch platform.
Rick C