41 Magnum GP100

Stopsign32v

Bearcat
Joined
Jun 13, 2024
Messages
87
Location
SC
Come on Ruger, I'm sure you could do it.

I want a Match Champion 6 shot capacity 41 Magnum GP100 stainless. Let me scratch that itch.
 
Register to hide this ad
SAAMI shows the .357 at 1.405" OAL cartridge length while .41 is shown at 1.540" OAL.

This might be dealt with by selection of blunter bullets, however. There's also the possibility that the cylinder could be a little longer with the reduction in barrel protrusion into the frame window and careful barrel/cylinder gapping.

The 10mm is slightly smaller in diameter and is rimless, true . . . if considerably shorter, which doesn't matter here.

Don't know about the cylinder diameter.
 
Last edited:
"Rugged, Reliable Ruger Revolvers!"

Their motto.

Due to the number of potential idiots who max load, or think loading manuals are just guidelines,, I seriously doubt the lawyers would approve. And the engineers who may consider it,, well, they too know how stupid some people can be.

Lastly,, while many of us enjoy a .41 magnum,, Ruger is into SALES. LOTS of sales. Initially, they would sell some. But if they offered it in stainless, many would say; "Not until they make it in blue." Or if offered with a 4" barrel,, many would say; "I want it in a 3" or a 5" or whatever.
Hard to build a model that pleases enough people to where you get a lot of sales!

And as for a 5-shot vs a 6 shot revolver, don't tell the serious custom gun makers who build strong, serious calibers, not to build them in 5 shot.
 
Last edited:
From the 'Beating a dead horse' dept.......
Dave Clements did this conversion to 41 Special, and advised that it would handle a 220 gr cast bullet
at 1200 f/s. I haven't pushed it that hard since I find a 220-230 at 1000 f/s solves all the problems I'm
likely to encounter. Haven't had any rim diameter issues using Starline. He wouldn't attempt a 41 Mag due
to cylinder window space and chamber wall thickness concerns.



 
Last edited:
No, that would ruin headspace.

uVEg7jR.jpg


fFdrPqc.jpg
 
Saying the revolver hangs together during this initial testing. I would probably make it through about 4 cylinders full or 28 rounds 41 magnum and hang it up as an "emergency use only" firearm due to recoil and my hand and wrist.
 
"Dave Clements.
He wouldn't attempt a 41 Mag due
to cylinder window space and chamber wall thickness concerns."

^^^^THIS^^^^

Exactly why you won't get a 6 shot GP-100 revolver.


Yep. When I said "Looks good to me" I was referring to the clearance between rims in the cylinder, not the application of the .41 Mag. I referred to this in post #4. :)
 
Last edited:
They could use the same barrel shank arrangement as the 10mm version, which is actually larger than the .44Spl version. I'd wager it would have to be a five shot.


You never heard a revolver get the nickname "5 shot".

I'm officially not interested in any revolver that has less or more than 6 holes in the cylinder. I'll die on that hill
You know how many revolvers were produced before the Colt SAA that had everything but six charge holes? Quite a few, even Colt's. The first Colt revolvers were 8-shot rifles.
 
Last edited:
OK, the .41 Mag case/chamber has a smaller diameter than that of the 10mm Auto, and they have comparable pressures.

Hamilton Bowen has chambered the GP100 for the .41 Special, same case diameter as the .41 Mag.

Talo has offered the GP100 in 10mm Auto, a 6-shot.

Hmmmm. :unsure:

I was thinking the same thing but remembered the issue with rim interference that Ruger had to deal with with the 7-shot .357's and out of spec ammo. Bowen did chamber the GP in .41Spl but it's a wildcat and you can pick & choose your cases. With a factory .41Mag, any and all factory loads would be to be usable. It could go either way but man, that GP cylinder is not very large in diameter.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top