Acorn
Buckeye
Just for conversation. If I were to send my .357 Max. back to Ruger, in light of the recall, would they repair it?
Last edited:
People tried doing things with the Max's for which it wasn't intended, leading to bad press, (top strap flame cutting)Bill Ruger decided to scrap the idea and recall the ones sold and scrap the product in factory inventories.What recall and what repair?
Fully aware of the recall and the reasons for it. I was more interested in the concept of a "repair" as I had never heard that before.People tried doing things with the Max's for which it wasn't intended, leading to bad press, (top strap flame cutting)Bill Ruger decided to scrap the idea and recall the ones sold and scrap the product in factory inventories.
In a nutshell.
Fully aware of the recall and the reasons for it.
No , the best thing to do with one of these fabulous revolvers is to leave it alone. They aren't making any more of these ( but they should). Just my humble $.02.If you have one; don't send back. They will try to keep it. Best thing to do is send to Jack Huntington for a 500 Maximum conversion
What were people trying to do to the Max that was a problem?People tried doing things with the Max's for which it wasn't intended, leading to bad press, (top strap flame cutting)Bill Ruger decided to scrap the idea and recall the ones sold and scrap the product in factory inventories.
In a nutshell.
At the time of the 357 Max introduction, the gun world was being taken over by the dubious search for maximum velocity. The 357 max comes along and the lure of high speed caused folks to load light, 125 gr bullets over large doses of powder. The resulting heat and blast in the forcing cone area produced flame cutting in the top strap and premature erosion of the barrel throat.What were people trying to do to the Max that was a problem?