Ruger Marlin vs Henry

I have the 1894 SBL in .357. You will not be disappointed.
1754695747505.png


With the Leupold VX II 1-4x20 on it, it will punch out the bullseye at 50 yards, completely. It is smooth as silk, zero issues, and an absolute joy to shoot.
 
Had a Henry .357, don't miss it. Traded my three Henry rifles for two new Rossi's (R92 .357 and R95 .30-30) and couldn't be happier.
 
I had a Henry .357- it was a beautiful gun. 20 inch octagon barrel, polished aluminum receiver, and some beautiful furniture. Thing was as smooth as butter, but it weighed a ton. I wanted to replace it with something lighter and a local gun shop offered to trade me for a new Ruger/Marlin. The fit & finish on the new Marlins is fantastic. The action has some of that “zipper” feel you get from machining, but it’s started to wear in and feels much better.

I have a Henry carbine in .45 and it’s great, as are my Henry .22 and .22mag. I’ve never had a Rossi. I was looking at them but the prices around here were so inflated they I got the Marlin.
 
A "blued and wood" pre-safety Rossi '92 Carbine would be my pick....If I could find one that hasn't been modified, "slicked up", or otherwise tinkered with.

DGW
Ahhhhhhhh Yes the Rossi is nice, but the toggle link side plate rifles are so easy to clean and replace parts on. They say they are not strong. They are strong enough for modern cartridges with the modern steel. Until you have cycled a tuned short stroked 73 you don't know what smooth is :) :) :) :) I though my Marlin was smooth, and it is, until I got my 73.
Bottom line all are good ;)
 
Have a pre loading gate Henry in 357. Super smooth action. Put a Skinner sight on it and I'm plenty accurate with it.
Always wanted a Marlin Stainless in 357 so I finally picked up an SBL. Fit and finish seem top notch. Cycling snap caps through action is fine. Have not gotten to the range yet. We'll see which I'm most accurate with and see which one I keep. Likely to keep both though......
 
Yall keep buying all the Rossis
And Henrys.
Leaves more Marlins for the rest of us.

I'd rather have the 1st Remlin that came off the line, than a Rossi.
If I have to explain it, you ain't gonna understand.
I understand it but I will say that Rossi is a whole lot better than they used to be. I have seen many good and bad ones, just as I have seen many good and bad Remlins. For the money at this point they are not a bad option.
However overall I like the Marlin over the other two.
 
JM guns are crap after 2000. All Remlins are crap. The Ruger made ones are way too expensive and bougie. My Rossi is 40 years old and was made with all steel parts and no safety. There are no issues with those or the ones made after about 2022. Any of the other years or parent companies, well beware. My Marlins are all classics except one M60 made in 1988...that might be considered a classic now anyway. Marlin didn't make an 1892 which is superior to an 1894 in every way.
 
When's the last time you looked at one? I've got three and they aren't the guns of 20yrs ago.

The JM guns weren't all that great either.
To each his own.
I will say that most of my Marlins are 1960s -1980.
Although I do own some stainless JM"s and a Ruger, currently.
But I've owned 2 Remlins and had no problems.
Yall keep buying Rossi's and Henrys..
 
Since this thread started I bought a Ruger/Marlin .357 and after shooting both sold my Rossi.

The Rossi never really clicked with me. The Ruger/Marlin is really nice. No regerts
IMG_9723.jpeg

Finding a pre safety .357 of any make is next to impossible. So I think the Ruger/Marlin is the way to go
 
Last edited:
A quick spin at GoG shows Marlin $1025, Henry $925 and Rossi $695. An extra $230 buys quite a bit of ammo to have fun with a new rifle. The only downside I can see to the Rossi is the large gap between lever and stock when the lever is closed.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top