Conceal carry handguns

Help Support Ruger Forum:

Joined
Jan 26, 2008
Messages
796
Location
north carolina
I'm about to upgrade my EDC from a Taurus G2 to either a Glock 19 or 45. Do you have a preference between the 19 and the 45? I have a Glock 30 I'm quite fond of but I don't carry it much anymore.
A thread for another day would be a CMP Range Grade but that's a bit outside of the budget at the time.
First off I am not an expert on glocks or anything else but I can share some if my opinions and observations with you. I don't have a model 45 but it is basically a 19 with the 17 grip. I like them both but I've never met a glock I didn't like. I like the newer glocks without the finger groves the best. As far as carrying the 19, 45, or 30 concealed, they are all to big for me. I've been carrying concealed in N C since 1995 and am 75 years old. I have 11 glock 9mms, 2 45s, 2 40s, a 380, and a 22. All glocks. As you can see, the 9mm is my favorite caliber. Whether you carry a 45 or 40 or 9mm, I don't think makes much difference as long as you can hit a 6 inch or so target offhand most if the time at 10 yards. My favorites for conceal carry are the 43 on the waist and the 43x in a shoulder holster. I like shoulder holsters and have 9. My 43s hold 7 in the magazine with the plus 1 finger extension. The 43x holds 10. But Shield Arms makes a 15 round flush fitting mag for it. The 43x in a galco miami classic is super comfortable. The gun is thin, the barrel is short which keeps it from bonking the back of the seat when you sit and the grip is long enough to grab quickly. I also have the model 48 which is the 43x with a longer barrel. I would suggest you go in a gun shop or a gun show and pick them up and see how they feel to you. To me, the 43x and 48 have the best feeling grips of all the glocks. Hope this helps.View attachment 10636View attachment 10637
 
Last edited:
Joined
Dec 16, 2005
Messages
7,302
Location
On the beach and in the hills
I'm not a big guy. About 5'8" on a tall day. But I can conceal full size 1911's, N frame Smiths, Ruger Blackhawks and so on. And when I choose to cary a glock it's a 30. I have no problem concealing these sized firearms. I wonder if it's a bad choice of wardrobe or simply being overly preoccupied with having a sidearm that cause folks to strive for ever smaller and less useable handguns.
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2008
Messages
796
Location
north carolina
I'm not a big guy. About 5'8" on a tall day. But I can conceal full size 1911's, N frame Smiths, Ruger Blackhawks and so on. And when I choose to cary a glock it's a 30. I have no problem concealing these sized firearms. I wonder if it's a bad choice of wardrobe or simply being overly preoccupied with having a sidearm that cause folks to strive for ever smaller and less useable handguns.
Jeepnik, I'm around 5'11" and 200 lbs and I'm sure I could carry any of the guns mentioned concealed but I couldn't do it comfortably. Of the 4 you mention I own them all but the N frame which is an impressive hunk of steel. All but the glock 30 are in around 38 and up in ounces. The 1911 is thin but very heavy.. The glock 30 is light enough but very thick. Its amazing how Maybe 1/8 inch thinner makes such a big difference in the feel of a handgun.. I am not at all disparaging your choices though, just giving my personal opinions. The glock 43 and 43x are under 20 ounces and thin. They each feel very "svelte" in hand to me. And I can assure you there is nothing less usable about the 43x. Luckily we live in a time when we have so many choices. And I truly respect everyone's opinions and choices. The heavier guns are only comfortable for me to carry in rigs like these though not concealable.View attachment 10693
 
Last edited:
Top