Recent content by SR9c

And how is there 18 rounds in that 13 round flush fit mag?

My experience with double stack 1911 45's has been all the same...with Kimber, Para, BUL, the gun was not designed to feed from a double stack and I never had one that was reliable...in Para's, I tried the P12 (twice), P10, P18 9mm, P14 and the Warthog version of the 9mm 3"...I gave up finally...

The SF model they market in Calif has the regular Glock rail and single side mag release...they come with 10 round mags, but I used them for car mags at the time and just got regular mags, and with the single mag release, it takes old or new style mags...your dealer could order one from dist...

Well, I have on my flame proof suit....It the M&P had come out the same time as the Glock, and if S&W had given them away to the LE Agencys the way Glock did...At this point in time, people would say; "Glock who"? S&W is slowly taking back market share now, and if they had 25 years to "improve"...

Nope, no suspenders. I do use a 1 1/2" thick leather gunbelt (Galco) and keep it tight..I'm about 6'/280lbs, so another 24 ozs just does not matter to me, and since they fit in the same holster, I will take the 3 extra rounds and the better trigger anytime...However, if everyone shared my weird...

I understand...It's just I only have one purpose for a gun, and so I only have single purpose handguns...PERSONAL DEFENSE...and in the past years (last 20) I would shoot an average of 400-600 rounds per month, always with whatever I was using for concealed carry at the time, so durability is a...

I have purchased 2 SR9c's, I have the Stainless now & the Black one will be in next week. I carry it in my front pocket in an Uncle Mike's #3 pocket holster and it works just fine. I have owned a PF-9 and would not swap one SR9c for a box full of them, except to resell them and buy more...

I saw one run over by a tank at Ft. Hood, TX back in the 60's and after the track rolled over it, it got up and ran off...(soft dirt, cut up by the tanks, or else it was "super armadillo")

I sling shot mine anyway, it's the way I was trained, so to me, it's a moot point!

If my user name and avatar does not give away my opinion on this subject, I will do it with words. I have owned and shot each of your choices and have owned and shot their full size models as well. If looks matter, the SR9 models are by far the best looking and the ergonomics are as good as...

Well, there is one in every crowd, and I will be "it"..Even being on a fixed income (retired), I would give up a meal a day to save a few more bucks rather than go so low as to get a Hi-Point anything...There, I've been revealed, I am a closet "gun snob". As low as I will go is Bersa and Kel-tec.

No, I did not. In fact, when I removed the mag disconnect, I did not even do it then...I don't think I have ever done that to a single pistol I have ever owned in 40 years...I will give it a bath tonight..thanks

I posted in another thread about being new here and waiting on a Black SR9c to come in to my dealer. He had a Stainless in stock with a super nice trigger, but I wanted Black...Still do, but this morning, I went ahead and got the Stainless because I knew how good the trigger was. Put 50 rounds...

Should I be concerned with 2 light strikes out of 50?...SR9c, bought today and took out of box and shot it. Using Hornady FXT and Federal NATO M882 ball. Light strikes were with ball..just recocked and it fired...looking at all brass, none had a real deep indentation as compared with some...

Well, the obvious choice is the LCP... light weight. The AMT is history...been out of business for years now...The NAA is sized right, but very heavy by comparison. From my experience, I have owned the Kel-tec, NAA, Seecamp and ofcourse the usual PPK, PPK/s, Sig P230 & 232, Colt mustang...