Recent content by NexxusOne

I prefer to use Fed HST 124gr but my sig is picky and doesnt like them...so I use Critical Defense and it works well.

The trigger has a ton of take up and the grip is huge, but I got used to the trigger and added a hogue onto the grip and works good for me now. The thing is more accurate than I will ever need, it has shot every round I put into it, and it has several thousand rounds through it and looks brand...

So...reading back through this thread, I do not see where I, or anyone else compared a P95 to anything. I simply stated for durability, being accurate enough, and value vs cost, I would put that gun up against any other gun that had been mentioned. I disagree with somebody who feels that if a...

Fiberglass reinforced polymer composite to be exact, but for simpler minds, plastic will do ;)

Ah, I get it!!! You are a gun snob! Right on!!! I said the triggers on the 3 I fired sucked (meaning for cost of Sig it should had been a whole lot better) and I personally do not like CZ's...and the analogy of burying it in dirt was to emphasize the amount of reliability I see in the P series...

I do not think so...I could bury the P95 in the dirt, dig it up 5 years later, put 20 year old ammo in it and still hit the bullseye. I never said it was better for fit and finish but I am not a gun collector, I buy them to shoot them and to protect me and my family...dependability is what it is...

There is a huge difference between plastic parts and a composite receiver. Just FYI, there are quite a few composite materials in the world that are much stronger than any metal you could dream up. I have a P95 also and I would put that gun up to the test of time over any of the firearms you...

I just got an SR9c a few weeks back and I do not feel the need to change anything in it...shoots great right out of the box after a good cleaning. Dead on accurate and trigger is very acceptable. The only thing I may change is the guide rod as I prefer metal parts over plastic...and this is not...