anyone who is even slightly better than an "average" pistol shot will/should INSTANTLY notice the difference between a typical 3-4 inch capable 1911 and a 1-2 inch capable 1911. OK, it might take 3-4 shots, but it will be readily apparent.
On the other hand, average is what most handgun...
this is the 25 meter test target for my SIG Super Match. All five shots fit inside the FRONT 2/3rds of the trigger guard.
My Joe Marcinko 1911 (the dark blued one in pic( will hold well UNDER 3 inches at FIFTY (5-0) yards from a Ranson Rest.
I can certainly hold all my shots in a ONE INCH...
If "put to rest" means that the 1911 is an average performer at best, then I agree 100%.
accuracy is VERY important to me. In fact, I like my 1911s to be (about) as accurate (with match wadcutters) as my Ruger Mark II .22 LR pistol.
I have been beaten up fairly severly over on the "other"...
in fact, 100 grain HBWC (hollow base wadcutters) over a fairly modest load of W231 is VERY accurate and about the only thing I shoot in my old SSM (bought it in 1992 0r so)/
of a CImarron SAA. It was originally a .357. I also had a Smith & Wesson rear sight milled into the backstrap. I would have used a Blackhawk. but for plinking, I hated the NM BH grips and went with a SAA type pistol. Except for the frustrations of dealing with Mr. Gallagher (i.e. "3 months"...