Recent content by AZSR9fan

Help Support Ruger Forum:

  1. A

    LCP's Anyone

    I liked my LCP, but after two years of practice with it, never felt confident enough with my ability to use it accurately in a defensive situation. It became just another bother to carry. I can't put my Sr9c in my pocket, but I don't mind the weight and the IWB carry. For me, if I ever really...
  2. A

    PHOTOS Please - compare LCP / LC9 - side-by-side

    Darkwolf, I agree completely with your assessment of "wanting a gun that I can shoot quickly on target." I also didn't feel comfortable with my accuracy and speed with my LCP even at relatively short distances and a Crimson Trace. Do you think that the LC9 solves those problem for you, rather...
  3. A

    LCP trade in value

    I got $215 for the LCP as the trade in for the SR9c. That included the Crimson Trace.
  4. A

    How Reliable is a RUGER SR9C ???

    Exactly the same as I have and I appreciate 'em all! Good luck with your new weapon.
  5. A

    LCP trade in value

    I traded the LCP I got in 2009 today for a new SR9c. I got 39% of the original price toward the trade in. Is that a "fair" amount in your experience? Thanks!
  6. A

    New (to me) Mark II

    I just got my new (to me) MkII a while ago and I'm really enjoying it. The only change so far that I've done is add a set of Hogue wrap-around grips. I think that has helped stabilize my grip and improved my accuracy. I enjoy changing up between my MkII, SR9, and LCP at the range. Always...
  7. A

    MkII: Improvement in accuracy?

    I just got an email back from Ruger in Prescott saying that the "drill and tap" on the MkII would cost just $35 plus any parts for them to do it at the factory. Sounds like a pretty good deal to me. Thoughts anyone?
  8. A

    SR9c... GOT IT!!!!! **PIC UPDATE**

    So here's my question.... If you could have only one for concealed carry, the SR-9 C or the LCP, which would it be?
  9. A

    MkII: Improvement in accuracy?

    Thanks! Being from Arizona, I'll drop Ruger a note and see what can be done.
  10. A

    MkII: Improvement in accuracy?

    My MkII is an approximately 1988-1989 build, and does not come already tapped for a scope rail. I'm supposing that it would be a costly exercise to have that done. True?
  11. A

    MkII: Improvement in accuracy?

    How did you (or a gunsmith) install a Weaver type rail, so that you could put a Red Dot scope on-board? I know that the MkIII's come with the scope mount, but wonder if you have to "drill holes" for the scope mount on a MkII?
  12. A

    MkII: Improvement in accuracy?

    I know it's been asked before, and it seems to boil down to personal preference but, anyone have any current feedback about: 1. Installing both front HiViz sight and back "V" notch sight on my MkII or..... 2. Installing just a rear "V" to replace the standard "U" sight or..... 3. Forget both...
  13. A

    Value of MkII stainless?

    Thanks all! Great feedback and very helpful.
  14. A

    Value of MkII stainless?

    What do think the value would be of a stainless MkII, 5.5 inch bull barrel with a serial number that places it around 1988-1989? The condition looks excellent (around 95 out of 100) with just a couple of surface scratches that look like they might have come from holstering and unholstering in...
  15. A

    red dot scope vs. stand up red dot sight

    Thanks. Other than "personal preference", I agree it comes down to trigger time to see which someone prefers. But from your comment, since I would be using the scope or sight for paper target shooting and not varmits, the tube set up sounds better for me. I'll try both at the range and see...

Latest posts

Top