Consecutive pair of Red Eagles

Help Support Ruger Forum:

RPM Enterprises

Buckeye
Joined
Jan 14, 2002
Messages
1,062
Location
Rugerville,WA. U.S.A.
I recently was contacted about a red eagle that was for sale. I had asked what the serial number was. Well 13547... A type 8 the most common red eagle variation. Looking in my notes I had serial number 13548 WOW!! a consecutive pair. I had asked to see pictures of the gun. On my way to work the seller had contacted me by email with pictures. When I arrived in the parking lot I contacted the seller and made the deal with out looking at the pictures sent (I only had a few minutes before I started work). When I got at my desk I decided to look at the pictures and noticed that this gun serial number 13547 had a blue trigger. MMMM??? that would be a type 9. Not only the two guns were consecutive but I had two different variations. Serial number 13548 was shipped March 1951 according to Ruger factory letter. I have requested a letter for serial number 13547 to see when it was shipped. According to Chad it should fall between June 18, 1951 and August 22, 1951. So even that the two are consecutive they may have been assembled and shipped a few months apart from each other.

consecuativeredeagles002_zps1745d673.jpg


consecuativeredeagles001_zps770fa20d.jpg


consecuativeredeagles006_zps36a38429.jpg


consecuativeredeagles005_zps46c3b902.jpg
 

radicalrod

Hunter
Joined
Jan 9, 2004
Messages
3,567
Location
Bowling Green, Oh
Hey Rick, Congrats on the new pair.....

I love the feeling I get when I get to do this :lol: :lol: :lol:

And I have done it a few times :wink: :wink: :wink: RR
 

fredrx

Single-Sixer
Joined
Oct 16, 2006
Messages
200
Location
DE
Oddball pair or a pair that captures the actual transition -- either way, not many of those out there. Congrats!
 

contender

Ruger Guru
Joined
Sep 18, 2002
Messages
25,466
Location
Lake Lure NC USA
Chalk up another great score AND a collectors differences in a pair. This is the kind of excellent information we need to record & share for all collectors.
Way to go Rick!
 

radicalrod

Hunter
Joined
Jan 9, 2004
Messages
3,567
Location
Bowling Green, Oh
Well these two are both type 1's .....

I was kinda excited when I saw the one on GB knowing the other was in my safe :lol: :lol: :lol: RR

P9290530.jpg


P9290531.jpg
 

RPM Enterprises

Buckeye
Joined
Jan 14, 2002
Messages
1,062
Location
Rugerville,WA. U.S.A.
An interesting note is that while working on my red eagle display looks like in the type 9 variation 13547 is the earliest one known and 21907 is the last one known. Seems I have both in my collection :) :)
 

chet15

Hawkeye
Joined
Jan 22, 2001
Messages
6,009
Location
Dawson, Iowa
RPM Enterprises said:
An interesting note is that while working on my red eagle display looks like in the type 9 variation 13547 is the earliest one known and 21907 is the last one known. Seems I have both in my collection :) :)

That depends on how one looks at it. The receiver that has sn 6543 on it didn't get fully manufactured as a pistol until July 30, 1951, which was right smack in the middle of Type 9 production, so it got a grip frame and other internal parts from July 1951 production, including a large button grip frame, blue bolt and yes...blue trigger. But the receiver of 6543 is that of a Type 3 pistol...square port, 1/4" dovetail rear sight and rounded muzzle crown.
A classic example of Ruger not going by the first in first out method.
Chet15
 

Latest posts

Top