Handgun Bear Calibers
- Thread starter Jeff41Mag
- Start date
Help Support Ruger Forum:
- Status
Quarterbore
Blackhawk
I consider the 41 Mag to be where a good deer handgun roun starts. Sure, with proper bullets it can penetrate well enough to break bone and certainly kill BUT if you are serious about hunting these critters then I think your minimums need to start at heavy loaded 44 Mag or 45 Colts and even then you will be lite on performance.
Something in the 454 Casull range out of a full length barrel is what I would want to use as my personal minimum if I were seriously hunting these critters you list.
Now, if you have a guide with a serious rifle or shotgun with slugs as a backup then sure you can make do with less gun. Still, a bigger slug sounds like what I want!
Something in the 454 Casull range out of a full length barrel is what I would want to use as my personal minimum if I were seriously hunting these critters you list.
Now, if you have a guide with a serious rifle or shotgun with slugs as a backup then sure you can make do with less gun. Still, a bigger slug sounds like what I want!
Lee Martin
Hunter
If I were going after grizzly I'd go 45 Colt or larger. That said, I gotta think 41 Mag with 265's @ 1,400 fps would suffice. BTW, what load and gun are you using to get those speeds? Sounds pretty hot.
Hugh
Buckeye
Seeing as how grizzlies are protected, I don't really believe most folks would be hunting them. That said, any shooting of a grizzly would be defensive in nature. When a bear is coming toward you he/she is probably walking or running on all four feet. Likewise if it is perpendicular to you.
The shooter's presence of mind is especially critical in the coming toward you situation. The bear's head is large and for a "very calm" shooter a good target, actually it probably would be pretty close to the center of a head on animal. I'd say good penetrating bullet of 265 grains would be pretty effective. Perpendicular to the shooter I'd suggest a head or heart area shot with the same type of bullet.
But then I'd probably not be all that calm under either of those situations. The reason being, with a head on shot it's me or the bear. With a perpendicular shot it's either somebody else's life or the bear.
The shooter's presence of mind is especially critical in the coming toward you situation. The bear's head is large and for a "very calm" shooter a good target, actually it probably would be pretty close to the center of a head on animal. I'd say good penetrating bullet of 265 grains would be pretty effective. Perpendicular to the shooter I'd suggest a head or heart area shot with the same type of bullet.
But then I'd probably not be all that calm under either of those situations. The reason being, with a head on shot it's me or the bear. With a perpendicular shot it's either somebody else's life or the bear.
BearBio
Buckeye
I would not feel any more undergunned, assuming hardcast lead, with that 41 load. I carried a 41 as a sidearm while guiding on pigs. My wife carries one here (we do have grizzlies, even if scarce).
That being said, I carry a 45 Colt, 3oo or 325 hardcast @ 1250-1300 fps. for woodswork.
However, I prefer spray over a handgun. Just my (professional) opinion based on one bear charge, 2 dozen+ grizzly sightings, and 10 years in grizzly country. Oh, and conversations with LE and Refuge personnel here and in Alaska. Take it for what you feel it is worth.
That being said, I carry a 45 Colt, 3oo or 325 hardcast @ 1250-1300 fps. for woodswork.
However, I prefer spray over a handgun. Just my (professional) opinion based on one bear charge, 2 dozen+ grizzly sightings, and 10 years in grizzly country. Oh, and conversations with LE and Refuge personnel here and in Alaska. Take it for what you feel it is worth.
5of7
Hunter
There is no handgun cartridge that is a "good" Grizzly Bear load......period.
What a handgun will do for you if you are attacked by a Griz, is that MAYBE you will be able to kill the bear before the bear kills you........but the odds are not that good.
IMO. :shock:
What a handgun will do for you if you are attacked by a Griz, is that MAYBE you will be able to kill the bear before the bear kills you........but the odds are not that good.
IMO. :shock:
Short Barrel
Blackhawk
I agree with Quarterbore and Lee Martin.The .41 is a great gun.It will crack a grizzlies skull if you are lucky enough to hit it but if I were serious enough to hunt those animals mentioned,I would be serious enough to get and work into more gun.I've killed elk and moose with heavy .45 Colt loads and they are stouter built than most grizzlies.
Grizzlies are only protected in the lower 48.Hundreds are hunted and taken in Canada and Alaska every Spring and Fall,as well as those shot in self defense throughout there range.Many have been stopped by handguns.A bowhunter stopped a grizzly here,a couple weeks ago with a handgun.I haven't heard the caliber yet but the most common carried here is the .44 mag.
If I were serious about hunting that game,I would prefer the .475 or .500 Linebaugh though the .454 would be good also.I like some frontal diameter and heavy weight for penetration.Anyone who can hunt all those animals can afford a new handgun.
Grizzlies are only protected in the lower 48.Hundreds are hunted and taken in Canada and Alaska every Spring and Fall,as well as those shot in self defense throughout there range.Many have been stopped by handguns.A bowhunter stopped a grizzly here,a couple weeks ago with a handgun.I haven't heard the caliber yet but the most common carried here is the .44 mag.
If I were serious about hunting that game,I would prefer the .475 or .500 Linebaugh though the .454 would be good also.I like some frontal diameter and heavy weight for penetration.Anyone who can hunt all those animals can afford a new handgun.
Jimbo357mag
Hawkeye
+1 .....Grizzly = 45-70 Rifle. 8) 8)5of7 said:
...Jimbo
CraigC
Hawkeye
I think if Ross Seyfried's .45Colt can penetrate several feet of Cape buffalo, or if Larry Kelly can take the Big Five with a .44Mag, a good sixgun load should do fine on an 800lb bear. :roll:5of7 said:
Lee Martin
Hunter
I've not hunted grizzly, but I gotta think it comes down to whether you have time to place the shot. As noted, if you're surprised by one you may not have time to react....be it with a handgun or a rifle.
Now if you have time to aim, that's a different story. I've become pretty good with this 475 Linebaugh and I'm confident a 420 WFN in the right spot would do the job.
As big as grizzlys are, they have bone, flesh, vital organs, and bleed like any other animal. You just need enough gun and the ability to hit.
Now if you have time to aim, that's a different story. I've become pretty good with this 475 Linebaugh and I'm confident a 420 WFN in the right spot would do the job.
As big as grizzlys are, they have bone, flesh, vital organs, and bleed like any other animal. You just need enough gun and the ability to hit.
buckeyeshooter
Blackhawk
I figure you got 1 shot--- maybe. If I am limited to a handgun, it would be my 6 1/2 inch S & W 500 with a hot loaded 440 grain hardcast. I'd prefer a 458WM in a rifle for an angry charging bear.
Lee,
That looks like a Bisley Super Blackhawk converted to .475 Linebaugh. Did Linebaugh do the conversion, or rather, who did the work on that fine peice?
Jeff
P.S. I should have noted, I own two Super BH Hunters, one in hand, one on order, both in 41Mag. They are distributor exclusives through Davidson's, and maybe 27 are left if anybody wants one. They come stainless, non-fluted cylinder, and a solid rib with cut-outs for a scope. They also come with the rings, and black laminate grips. So the .41 will be my primary hunting pistol, and I was wondering if it was worth it to carry when in brown/grizzly country as a back up. I'd like to get an FA in .475 LB or .500 WE, but have not shot either of those so I don't know about the recoil.
So I third handgun might be in order for optimum performance, or it seems the .41 heavily loaded might work if I can swing the 7.5 inch barrel fast enough in an emergency.
I am considering as a 3rd gun the Std Redhawk in 45 Colt with hot loads, or a big bore .475LB or .500WE. What do you guys think?
I don't actively hunt grizzlies. It would be a packing gun/defense gun.
Thanks.
Jeff
That looks like a Bisley Super Blackhawk converted to .475 Linebaugh. Did Linebaugh do the conversion, or rather, who did the work on that fine peice?
Jeff
P.S. I should have noted, I own two Super BH Hunters, one in hand, one on order, both in 41Mag. They are distributor exclusives through Davidson's, and maybe 27 are left if anybody wants one. They come stainless, non-fluted cylinder, and a solid rib with cut-outs for a scope. They also come with the rings, and black laminate grips. So the .41 will be my primary hunting pistol, and I was wondering if it was worth it to carry when in brown/grizzly country as a back up. I'd like to get an FA in .475 LB or .500 WE, but have not shot either of those so I don't know about the recoil.
So I third handgun might be in order for optimum performance, or it seems the .41 heavily loaded might work if I can swing the 7.5 inch barrel fast enough in an emergency.
I am considering as a 3rd gun the Std Redhawk in 45 Colt with hot loads, or a big bore .475LB or .500WE. What do you guys think?
I don't actively hunt grizzlies. It would be a packing gun/defense gun.
Thanks.
Jeff
Lee Martin
Hunter
Jeff41Mag said:
Thanks Jeff. I actually did the conversion myself.
Don Lovel
Hunter
I do not ever want to have to field dress any animal that it takes a round as powerful as 420gr 475 Linebaugh to stop
Way more stinky work than I want to do
Way more stinky work than I want to do
flatgate
Hawkeye
The only Field Dressing you'll need to do if you survive a Griz attack with the help of your handgun will be changing into some "fresh huggies"......
JMHO,
flatgate
PS Sure, I carry a .45 cal., 335 gr. hardcast at 1575 fps in my "bear gun". I sure hope I never need to use it or the Pepper Spray on my belt.
JMHO,
flatgate
PS Sure, I carry a .45 cal., 335 gr. hardcast at 1575 fps in my "bear gun". I sure hope I never need to use it or the Pepper Spray on my belt.
Ultrarunner
Bearcat
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2011
- Messages
- 8
If I get it in time, I'll be carrying my Redhawk 44 in Alaska this summer. Otherwise I'll deal with the extra weight and size and go with the 454 Super which a few dealers have in stock locally. Hiking with a big gun is probably not necessary, but I wouldn't skimp on homeowners insurance either...
Caliber aside the other part of the question is what are you intending on doing? Hunting or Self Defense?.....looks like I missed your last post...SD it is
For a hunting situation, you may be able to use the .41 if you have someone backing you up with something bigger. As others have said time and time before, shot placement is crucial.
If for SD then I would have to agree with the rest on here....bigger is better. Add on top of that I would prefer a double action to a single.
If that big bad grizz decides that I am to be the main course tonight, I don't want to have to worry about thumbing back the hammer on the first or any of the next five follow ups.
For a hunting situation, you may be able to use the .41 if you have someone backing you up with something bigger. As others have said time and time before, shot placement is crucial.
If for SD then I would have to agree with the rest on here....bigger is better. Add on top of that I would prefer a double action to a single.
If that big bad grizz decides that I am to be the main course tonight, I don't want to have to worry about thumbing back the hammer on the first or any of the next five follow ups.
5of7
Hunter
CraigC said:
The post by 98redline directly above this one makes a very good point. :roll:
I've spoken with 3 different guides in Alaska and they differ with their opinions. One says 12 gauge with Brenneke slugs, another says any old 357 mag will do and the last says anything that can break a shoulder and physically put 'im down.
2 say headshot is the only way to stop a charging grizz, the other says bunk, you'll never hit that head when its coming at you like a train and bobbing from side to side; it's an impossible target... what you aim at is the front point of the shoulder. You break his shoulder, his nose piles up in the dirt. He gets up, you hit the other shoulder. Then its over and you might as well take the 3rd shot to his head or heart.
I'm surprised the guys aren't chiming in about the latest Buffalo Bore ammo in 32 H&R mag, or the 9mm, 40 S&W and such.
The first year I fished in Alaska, we just had one 44 mag between us. The next time I took a Bowen tuned SRH 454. The last time it was a 5.5" Riger Redhawk in 45 Colt. Haven't been back in too long now. Had a Ruger Alaskan in 454 but sold it; too darn short for my taste. If I went up now I'd take a 5.5" Bisley in 45 Colt. But who knows...
I would say 44 mag/45Colt at the low end. Then again, there really isn't that much difference between the 41 mag, 44 mag... what, 0.019"?
I am happiest when we don't even see any bears.
2 say headshot is the only way to stop a charging grizz, the other says bunk, you'll never hit that head when its coming at you like a train and bobbing from side to side; it's an impossible target... what you aim at is the front point of the shoulder. You break his shoulder, his nose piles up in the dirt. He gets up, you hit the other shoulder. Then its over and you might as well take the 3rd shot to his head or heart.
I'm surprised the guys aren't chiming in about the latest Buffalo Bore ammo in 32 H&R mag, or the 9mm, 40 S&W and such.
The first year I fished in Alaska, we just had one 44 mag between us. The next time I took a Bowen tuned SRH 454. The last time it was a 5.5" Riger Redhawk in 45 Colt. Haven't been back in too long now. Had a Ruger Alaskan in 454 but sold it; too darn short for my taste. If I went up now I'd take a 5.5" Bisley in 45 Colt. But who knows...
I would say 44 mag/45Colt at the low end. Then again, there really isn't that much difference between the 41 mag, 44 mag... what, 0.019"?
I am happiest when we don't even see any bears.
Three44s
Single-Sixer
A good friend of mine just acquired a SRH six shot in .480 Ruger. It comes with brass, bullets and dies.
If he becomes satisfied that it's too much gun for himself, he's coming at me for a possible trade for one of my lesser revolvers.
It could prove interesting!
I have two .41's and some .44s.
I shoot the OP's bullet, the 265 gr. LFN gc in both of my .41's.
Many say the .41 offers less recoil ......... and I agree. BUT not when you throw that 265 grainer out there at a good pace.
Any critter hit with that bullet vs. a similarly constructed slug from a .44 at the same location with a similar metplat will NOT be able to discrern a difference.
When you move from the lower "40's" to the upper .40's .... Ie. the .480 and up .......... you have made significant progress (the .454 and .460 are closer to the bigger bored guns so long as the bullet integrity is up to the task)
I like what dougader posted:
"2 say headshot is the only way to stop a charging grizz, the other says bunk, you'll never hit that head when its coming at you like a train and bobbing from side to side; it's an impossible target... what you aim at is the front point of the shoulder. You break his shoulder, his nose piles up in the dirt. He gets up, you hit the other shoulder. Then its over and you might as well take the 3rd shot to his head or heart. "
I posted something like that a few years ago on this board and two members unleashed upon me the fury of hell ........
............ you'd thought thaa I was some kind of "baby killer" or something!!!
I'll stand on what I posted then .......... and what dougader was told by one of those Guides as pretty accurate ............. that being that to brain a charging bear .... at some distance where spit has "tradjectory" ............ is folley!
The shoulder is a BETTER target ........... and people that REALLY have skin in these games call it BREAKING DOWN the bear.
Once you have broken it down ........... you may ............ "may" get a better opportunity to get a CNS hit such as the skull that's worth beans.
Grizzly, Brownie or Black ........... it's going to be a rough equivalent of sheer luck either way .......... IF GOD wants you to live and you hold up your end of the bargain and MURPHY has the day off ....... you might just luck out.
If the gun in my hand was a .41 when something bad like this thread addresses ........ I would not lose much time regretting not having a better one. It would have the right round if I ventured into potential harms way and I'd just try to do my part ........ the rest would be decided for me.
Good stout SA's may be the ticket for some ......... I staked out my preference for DA's of stiff construction right from the start for such a circumstance.
Three 44s
If he becomes satisfied that it's too much gun for himself, he's coming at me for a possible trade for one of my lesser revolvers.
It could prove interesting!
I have two .41's and some .44s.
I shoot the OP's bullet, the 265 gr. LFN gc in both of my .41's.
Many say the .41 offers less recoil ......... and I agree. BUT not when you throw that 265 grainer out there at a good pace.
Any critter hit with that bullet vs. a similarly constructed slug from a .44 at the same location with a similar metplat will NOT be able to discrern a difference.
When you move from the lower "40's" to the upper .40's .... Ie. the .480 and up .......... you have made significant progress (the .454 and .460 are closer to the bigger bored guns so long as the bullet integrity is up to the task)
I like what dougader posted:
"2 say headshot is the only way to stop a charging grizz, the other says bunk, you'll never hit that head when its coming at you like a train and bobbing from side to side; it's an impossible target... what you aim at is the front point of the shoulder. You break his shoulder, his nose piles up in the dirt. He gets up, you hit the other shoulder. Then its over and you might as well take the 3rd shot to his head or heart. "
I posted something like that a few years ago on this board and two members unleashed upon me the fury of hell ........
............ you'd thought thaa I was some kind of "baby killer" or something!!!
I'll stand on what I posted then .......... and what dougader was told by one of those Guides as pretty accurate ............. that being that to brain a charging bear .... at some distance where spit has "tradjectory" ............ is folley!
The shoulder is a BETTER target ........... and people that REALLY have skin in these games call it BREAKING DOWN the bear.
Once you have broken it down ........... you may ............ "may" get a better opportunity to get a CNS hit such as the skull that's worth beans.
Grizzly, Brownie or Black ........... it's going to be a rough equivalent of sheer luck either way .......... IF GOD wants you to live and you hold up your end of the bargain and MURPHY has the day off ....... you might just luck out.
If the gun in my hand was a .41 when something bad like this thread addresses ........ I would not lose much time regretting not having a better one. It would have the right round if I ventured into potential harms way and I'd just try to do my part ........ the rest would be decided for me.
Good stout SA's may be the ticket for some ......... I staked out my preference for DA's of stiff construction right from the start for such a circumstance.
Three 44s
- Status
Similar threads
