357 mag full wadcutter for hunting?

Help Support Ruger Forum:

hammeredbean

Single-Sixer
Joined
Dec 3, 2010
Messages
129
Location
Southwest Tennessee
I was considering buying some wadcutters. The factory TC bullets I've used work great so why not a magnum wadcutter? I am not talking about hollow base soft alloy bullets that can blow their skirts off. I see that most are 148gr but found a Rimrock wadcutter bullet that is 155gr in their standard alloy. I think starting at 13ish gr of 2400 working up to 14 max would be about right. Has anyone tried this or have I drank some stale coffee?

I'd appreciate anyone who has experimented with this to chime in with advice.
 

98Redline

Blackhawk
Joined
Dec 9, 2010
Messages
681
Location
PA
No personal experience but the general thought is that there is a optimum meplat percentage (I believe around 70% of caliber) that balances the terminal ballistics with accuracy.

Too much meplat puts too much weight forward and causes the bullet to behave erratically in flight. I have also read that if the meplat is overly large it can cause the bullet to veer or tumble rather than drive straight through the animal.

I think that if there was some massive upshot to a full wadcutter hunting bullet that most of the manufacturers would offer something along those lines. Looking around there are lots of the WFN profile bullets with meplats in the 70% range but very...very few full wadcutters designed to be driven at magnum velocities. Not being able to research it myself to any appreciable degree, I would defer to the fact that if there were a better mousetrap with respect to cast bullet design, I am sure that it would be the most prevalent type in the industry (i.e. WFN hard cast bullets).

For small game, I have heard of people using wadcutters, and even using a HBWC and seating it backwards, but those are relatively short shots with low to moderate velocity.
 

John S

Bearcat
Joined
May 16, 2013
Messages
99
Location
S E Texas
I have a 77/357 rifle and it don't like the SWC. SWC are .358" D , my rifle wit shoot .357" down to .355" D bullet with accuracy.
 

Rick Courtright

Hawkeye
Joined
Mar 10, 2002
Messages
7,897
Location
Redlands CA USA
PO2Hammer said:
For small and medium game, why not?
I have data for cast DEWC that goes up to 1200 fps in .357.

Hi,

Have never used full WCs for hunting, but have read many accounts over the years of folks successfully using them for small game up to 50 yds or so. Personal experience w/ full WCs loaded to velocities a bit lower than that 1200 fps figure is they run out of steam pretty quickly "out there" when all we're doing is killing cans set up from 25-100 yds.

Rick C
 

Jim Puke

Hunter
Joined
Jul 9, 2013
Messages
3,088
Location
South Georgia
98Redline said:
Too much meplat puts too much weight forward and causes the bullet to behave erratically in flight.

There is no problem with full wadcutter accuracy...they have been one of the main bullets of choice for bullseye competition for years.
 

Jimbo357mag

Hawkeye
Joined
Feb 22, 2007
Messages
10,350
Location
So. Florida
I don't hunt yet but given a choice I think I would go with a proven 'hunting' bullet, of which there are plenty. :D
 

GP100man

Buckeye
Joined
Sep 13, 2006
Messages
1,386
Location
Tabor City, NC.
For short range they`re fine, but most shed velocity qwikly & start to keyhole/tumble between 50-60 yds.

Kinda like throwing a brick in a perfect spiral , ya can do it but it`ll start to wobble !
 

stevemb

Hunter
Joined
Aug 8, 2012
Messages
2,769
Matt's Bullets shows FWC's up to 165gr in 38/357. Sadly, he also now shows a 4 month wait ! stevemb
 

anachronism

Single-Sixer
Joined
Sep 20, 2008
Messages
402
Location
Lincoln, NE
Lyman actually shows magnum loads for 357 wadcutters in the third edition of the "Cast Bullet Handbook". While they don't show a 155 gr WC, they do show a 141 gr, with a starting load of 10.5 gr of 2400, and it maxes mout at 14.6 gr. Obviously you would need to make adjustments for your heavier bullet. Personally, I'd go ahead and do my load development and see how everything works out. Your 13.0 load appears to be safe, but it's up to you to establish the safety of your load. I wouldn't worry much about a wadcutter leaving the barrel at 12-1300 FPS destabilizing at 50 yards, but it's yet another part of load development, and you would find out rather early in your development what your practical limits are. You can also search out Lyman data from the '50s for 358432 wadcutters, they were available in a heavy version that weighed 160 gr. It's an interesting bullet, more like a SWC with a really short nose.
 

hammeredbean

Single-Sixer
Joined
Dec 3, 2010
Messages
129
Location
Southwest Tennessee
Thanks for all of the input. Range won't limit me if I decide to go forward with warm loaded wadcutters. My longest whitetail shots were 30 yds and for now that is as far as my proficiency will allow me this year. It seems like a logical concept as most bullet makers seem to try to maximize meplat for their hunting loads..... I wonder if the reduction in meplat from bullet designers is because of tumbling at "xx" range or some other reason. After thinking on it last night I did some extensive reading on Veral Smith's (LBT Bullets) website. The amount of effort and research he has done is astounding. His WFN 180 357 mold looks like a winner and seems to offer the maximum meplat he feels possible.

Just to add to the conversation on another tangent....up until now I have shot all of my deer with factory loaded federal 158 jsp's. This is a soft point truncated cone design. It is odd that the exit holes in all of the deer have been nice clean holes that I could wriggle my pinky finger into. This is what got me to thinking about full wadcutters...if a TC can do that, how much better would a wadcutter be? Also, another point of conversation that is totally irrelevant....my brother and I shot into dirt with a 38spl jframe snubbie. The bullet was hornandy swagged lead (really soft) moving pretty slow and it burried up 5-6" in the ground and made the prettiest mushroom you have ever seen. Sorry for rambling. My coffee grinder has been humming again. Once again thanks for the input.
 

357Nut

Bearcat
Joined
May 27, 2009
Messages
55
GP100man said:
For short range they`re fine, but most shed velocity qwikly & start to keyhole/tumble between 50-60 yds.

Kinda like throwing a brick in a perfect spiral , ya can do it but it`ll start to wobble !

My experience mirrors GP100man's.
 

volshooter

Buckeye
Joined
Apr 12, 2002
Messages
1,574
Location
EAST TN, USA
Under 50yds. they are fine game getters. I only speak from the .38spc. I have taken deer at 25-30 yds with excellent results. Accuracy is more important than power.

"most game falls to the lowly .22"
 

Cholo

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Dec 30, 2008
Messages
8,208
Location
Georgia
I come from the old: If it can't be done with Bullseye, Unique, and 2400... Lots of old myths have fallen by the wayside. I use nothing but WC's in all my .38's. I've always believed that past 50 yds. a WC is not your best choice for whatever reason. Bottom line, truth or myth?
 

GP100man

Buckeye
Joined
Sep 13, 2006
Messages
1,386
Location
Tabor City, NC.
Why the big deal on HOLE size ???

As long as ya punch the air bags & 2 holes are suckin wind ,you`ll find ya deer !

Less meat damage is the point I`m saying !

I ruined a whole shoulder once with a 140gr. sierra gamegetter with all the #9AA I dared to put under it , the deer was at 7yds.

Now it`s 357429s or NOEs 360-180 solid points, 1 hole in ,1 hole out , any angle ya wanna shoot from !

But , I`ll say within your range a wadcutter WILL knock a deer down as good as any other design IF the velocity is there & placement is good.

GP
 

hammeredbean

Single-Sixer
Joined
Dec 3, 2010
Messages
129
Location
Southwest Tennessee
The "Full Wadcutter" article was a good read! I wasn't previously aware of NOE bullet molds. I really like their website. All this makes me conclude that I will get some 148-155 gr wadcutters to try out. I'll start out mild and climb up to warm and see where accuracy and range begin to bicker. And also, I will add bullet casting to my short list of things to learn. I think I will end up with one of the NOE or LBT molds. But that ugly duckling full wadcutter intrigues me. I also saw a 100 gr wadcutter people are using a puff of Bullseye with...I have a six year old who might could appreciate that :) The way prices are now with ammo I can almost load 38 cheaper than buying 22!
 

PO2Hammer

Single-Sixer
Joined
Sep 4, 2003
Messages
259
Location
Minnesota
I don't know if they are enough for deer, I thought you were talking about smaller critters. I would only use a jacketed hollow point or LSWC-HP at full power for deer.
 

rburke

Bearcat
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
5
Location
Florida
:mrgreen: My wife shoots a Thompson G2, 9" barrel in .357 mag. We shoot out to 100yds using
home swaged 205 grain jacketed bullets. These are made using Corbin equipment with the button nose punch. These bullets are long full wadcutter style. Most use 16.5 grains of H4198.
A 165 grain version of the same load uses Power Pistol at 8 grains. Many of the 50 yard groups
are under one inch. I have never seen any unstable shots even at 100 yds. Much of the writings
about full wadcutter shooting is simply NOT true. There is one exception... the very light loads with BE powder.. 2.7 grains say, are probably tumbling beyond 25 yds. My gun, same as my wifes but in .45 auto Rim but 9.5" barrel shoots up to 270 grain button nose mostly at 50 yds
no problem. Think a moment, a deer at 100 yds gets smacked with a 205gr .357 wadcutter pushed with up to 17.0 grains of H4198. Don't think he's going far. These loads are real attention
getters at our local range.
 

Latest posts

Top