Who has a Alaskan , tell me what you think ..

Help Support Ruger Forum:

rob-c

Single-Sixer
Joined
Aug 2, 2012
Messages
240
So I have a SRH with the 9.5 inch barrel in 44 for hunting and I have been eyeing the Alaskan for a general woods carry. Just wanted to know what others thought and if you have a barreled SRH and a Alaskan what are if any differences when shooting them..
 

5of7

Hunter
Joined
Sep 22, 2010
Messages
2,296
Location
SW. LOWER MICHIGAN
I have an Alaskan in 480 Ruger. I also have a 7-1/2" SRH in the same caliber. The Alaskan produces about 200 fps lower velocity than the 7-1/2 inch gun with the exact same load.

Now, a 365 grain bullet at 1050 vs 1250 fps may occasionally be important, but I doubt it.

The thing that surprises me is that the Alaskan doe not produce any more felt recoil than the longer gun. 8)
 
Joined
Dec 19, 2001
Messages
10,129
Location
Alaska, Idaho USA
I have 3 of them. One of each caliber. What surprises me the most is how easy they shoot. The OP doesn't say where he's located but if you anticipate coming up against something big with sharp teeth that wants to kill you, I don't use the hottest loads. I prefer a heavy bullet that I can get back on target quickly, for multiple shots if necessary.
 

Mus408

Hunter
Joined
Apr 30, 2011
Messages
2,338
Location
Va.
I have the .454/.45 Colt and shoot hot .45 Colt loads out of it.
Great shooter and the large grip absorbs the recoil well. You will break your hand before the gun!
mx3qX5zl.jpg
 

Mus408

Hunter
Joined
Apr 30, 2011
Messages
2,338
Location
Va.
Since you mentioned .44 Mag....Well while not the Alaskan I have the S&W version which is the 629-2E in .44 Mag. I swapped on the S&W 500 grips which were MUCH better than the ones that came on it.
TuU4Rerl.jpg
 

rob-c

Single-Sixer
Joined
Aug 2, 2012
Messages
240
Thanks all, I live in upstate ny so really the only thing I have to worry about in the woods is a occasional coyote, black bear or the most common threat a 2 legged one.
 

Manchester

Bearcat
Joined
Dec 11, 2011
Messages
72
Location
Northwest Montana
I got my Alaskan for defense from toothy/sharp clawed things that would want to eat me. :shock:

In that role, I think its a great tool for the job.
 

hdonlybob

Single-Sixer
Joined
Sep 18, 2002
Messages
318
Location
Brodhead, Wisconsin
I bought one in .454 a few years ago "Just Because" LOL
Carried it in my truck for a while, and played with it.....then sold it for what I paid for it..
One Hellova handgun....
I did really enjoy it when sitting around a campfire up north where there were bears nearby ...
Good luck and let us know what you do.
Cheers,
HD
 

trapperon

Blackhawk
Joined
Feb 7, 2006
Messages
786
Location
Grand Rapids, Michigan
I have a 44 mag version and concur with the others...great revolver. I know your 9.5 incher has no muzzle rise or recoil to speak of, and its amazing that the alaskan feels the same way when shooting it. I have the compact suze gp100 ruger grips on mine and it gives the gun a much more proportionate look and makes it a little easier to pack. But overall its just amazing how pleasant they are to shoot.
I think it would be a great addition to your 9.5---and by the way another difference is they have no scope cut outs on the frame making it a cleaner look.

A final advantage to the alaskan is that you dont ever have to worry about the canted barrel issues we see quite ofter! The front and rear sight are on the same steel plane!

Ron
 
Joined
Mar 16, 2009
Messages
29
Location
Northeast Pennsylvania
I have one in 454. I can't handle it with the full power loads I use in my 7 1/2" SRH. In the 7 1/2" I shoot a 325 grain bullet at 1286 FPS. In the Alaskan I download the same bullet to just under 1000 FPS. Still very potent, and I'm able to shoot them without any issues. When I shoot the full power loads in the Alaskan, I get about 5 shots off before I start shaking too much to control it.

I've shot handguns all my life. I was amazed at how much difference in felt recoil there was between the two barrel lengths.
 

Varminterror

Blackhawk
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
513
I have all 3 Alaskans. They're hugely impractical, but are a ton of fun. I have compact GP100 grips on one of my 454's, it's inexcusably violent.
 

Silent Sam

Blackhawk
Joined
Feb 26, 2006
Messages
728
I have one in 454. People who are accustomed to shooting big bore handguns don't hand it back after one shot. It is surprisingly easy to shoot well given the sight radius. 300+gr bullets can be easily pushed over 1000-1200fps even in 45 Colt brass and I see no need for more out of a snub. More velocity just gets you more range, not more stopping power/penetration. The harshest part of shooting it is the blast and concussion, especially with full house 454 loads. Double hearing protection is a good idea. The grip really is outstanding for controlling recoil. I wouldn't swap them out for GP100 grips, ever. I think the 480 version is probably the ultimate if you reload, but i already loaded 45 Colt so that was the logical choice for me.
 
Joined
Jun 19, 2006
Messages
4,251
Location
Midwest Illinois
I have the SRH in 44 that has been chopped to 5". I recently got an Alaskan from here on the forum, and must say it is fun to shoot. Have only been out a few times with it, and have shot loads from 240 grains up to 305 grains. It is an accurate gun. I have put an XS big dot sight on it. Both 44's are fun and easy to handle.
 
Top