+1 I've heard, and experienced, the same thing. You cannot use lower power springs in a .22LR revolver the way you can in a centerfire and get the same reliability.Mus408 said:From what I have heard .22 DA revolvers tend to have a heavier trigger pull due to more hammer force needed to set the primer off.
I don't buy this. Maybe for certain gun models, due to the geometry or workmanship of the internals. But this doesn't hold true for all 22 double actions.Mus408 said:From what I have heard .22 DA revolvers tend to have a heavier trigger pull due to more hammer force needed to set the primer off.
OK, which one(s) doesn't it apply? My experience is with S&W and Ruger and it seems to be true for both of them.sp327 said:Mus408 said:But this doesn't hold true for all 22 double actions.
My Colt and Smith .22 DA revolvers don't have heavier mainsprings than their centerfire counterparts (which I also own), but then they're full-size guns. The "heavy springs" thing might mainly apply to smaller guns with lighter hammers--especially if they're spurless, which means they're even lighter yet.22/45 Fan said:OK, which one(s) doesn't it apply? My experience is with S&W and Ruger and it seems to be true for both of them.sp327 said:Mus408 said:But this doesn't hold true for all 22 double actions.
I agree on the full size .22LR revolvers having the same main springs as their centerfire counterparts but most centerfire revolvers can be successfully fitted with lighter springs and still remain reliable.Snake45 said:My Colt and Smith .22 DA revolvers don't have heavier mainsprings than their centerfire counterparts (which I also own), but then they're full-size guns. The "heavy springs" thing might mainly apply to smaller guns with lighter hammers--especially if they're spurless, which means they're even lighter yet.