Century Limited
Bearcat
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2013
- Messages
- 27
I have been wanting a 357/9mm convertible for many years. Once I save up for one, it seems that I always end up coming home with something else. I now have some cash marked just for a 9mm revolver. I have blinders on to all other guns aside from the 9mm carbine that I know I will not see.
Option one is the brand new 4.62" flattop stainless I actually held locally. Gun looks nice aside from a slight ding in top strap. If it were used, I would not think twice, but on new not so sure and no haggling on $602 price. Most days I prefer the looks of the 5.5", as cosmetically speaking, I think that the barrel should be longer than the ejector rod housing. Other days I think the barrel being same length looks ok.
Option two is buying a used blued 3 screw that has been converted, but comes with original parts in a bag. I understand that if it were put back original it would be one sweet trigger, but I would also have a R stamped on frame. I have heard many replies of "DO NOT UNDO THE UPGRADE" for liability reasons should someone some day be careless. I also hear that it could be more work than expected to put back, and if left modified the action feels gritty and one should simply buy the new model.
Option three would be to find a dealer to order the Lipsey's exclusive 5.5" stainless model that I like the looks of better. I hear some stories that with the 2 million challenge, some Ruger's have actually slipped by quality control. Sure, they would fix any issues, but would I be better off going option 1 and getting one I could see first. I know it would be an awesome gun too.
I wish to go stainless primarily because it will likely be used for 9mm at 10 yards or so in indoor range. I plan on using as I test loads, and to shoot loads too weak to cycle slide on semiauto handguns. I may need to file front sight down if I cannot raise rear sight high enough (Ruger customer service person says they do have 2 heights of rear sight blades and I could possibly switch to taller one and get by). I heard some convertibles left factory with too tall of front sight. I want to be able to undo shortening of front sight that is a pinned blade on SS vs one piece solid to gun on blued
I do not think any loads would be too weak to clear a 5.5" but not 4.62" barrel, or that if I were to shoot my plated bullets it would make a difference for plating separating from lead(I have other post concerning plated bullets)
I came into this with the mindset that longer sight radius helps me shoot more accurately, therefore worth the extra trouble to get the revolver with the slightly longer barrel. I then read a post from someone else whose eyes are not what they used to be and he stated the shorter barrel with sights closer together actually made it easier for him to shoot. I just looked down the sights of my various handguns (at home so did not shoot) and it seems I cannot see worth a hoot through any of them. (likely why I am buying more scopes even for lever actions). The rear sight always seems fuzzy to me, making it hard for me to distinguish exact top of sight. I may try the one ragged hole rear blade, and front blade may not matter id one inch closer or farther away.
I apologize for rambling on again. If not for stories of needing to ream cylinder throats as not always consistent and too small for lead bullets, I think I would have made purchase 15 years ago. Now that my wife has a couple 9mm handguns, and I only have one, I feel I should add one more option for us to shoot when we go to the range. She says she is not a fan of the single action grip but we will see.
I think I should just buy option one and be done with it. I could buy it and take possession immediately. I still would not have a 3 screw or have gotten a great deal though. I have no issue buying used when get a good deal.
Option one is the brand new 4.62" flattop stainless I actually held locally. Gun looks nice aside from a slight ding in top strap. If it were used, I would not think twice, but on new not so sure and no haggling on $602 price. Most days I prefer the looks of the 5.5", as cosmetically speaking, I think that the barrel should be longer than the ejector rod housing. Other days I think the barrel being same length looks ok.
Option two is buying a used blued 3 screw that has been converted, but comes with original parts in a bag. I understand that if it were put back original it would be one sweet trigger, but I would also have a R stamped on frame. I have heard many replies of "DO NOT UNDO THE UPGRADE" for liability reasons should someone some day be careless. I also hear that it could be more work than expected to put back, and if left modified the action feels gritty and one should simply buy the new model.
Option three would be to find a dealer to order the Lipsey's exclusive 5.5" stainless model that I like the looks of better. I hear some stories that with the 2 million challenge, some Ruger's have actually slipped by quality control. Sure, they would fix any issues, but would I be better off going option 1 and getting one I could see first. I know it would be an awesome gun too.
I wish to go stainless primarily because it will likely be used for 9mm at 10 yards or so in indoor range. I plan on using as I test loads, and to shoot loads too weak to cycle slide on semiauto handguns. I may need to file front sight down if I cannot raise rear sight high enough (Ruger customer service person says they do have 2 heights of rear sight blades and I could possibly switch to taller one and get by). I heard some convertibles left factory with too tall of front sight. I want to be able to undo shortening of front sight that is a pinned blade on SS vs one piece solid to gun on blued
I do not think any loads would be too weak to clear a 5.5" but not 4.62" barrel, or that if I were to shoot my plated bullets it would make a difference for plating separating from lead(I have other post concerning plated bullets)
I came into this with the mindset that longer sight radius helps me shoot more accurately, therefore worth the extra trouble to get the revolver with the slightly longer barrel. I then read a post from someone else whose eyes are not what they used to be and he stated the shorter barrel with sights closer together actually made it easier for him to shoot. I just looked down the sights of my various handguns (at home so did not shoot) and it seems I cannot see worth a hoot through any of them. (likely why I am buying more scopes even for lever actions). The rear sight always seems fuzzy to me, making it hard for me to distinguish exact top of sight. I may try the one ragged hole rear blade, and front blade may not matter id one inch closer or farther away.
I apologize for rambling on again. If not for stories of needing to ream cylinder throats as not always consistent and too small for lead bullets, I think I would have made purchase 15 years ago. Now that my wife has a couple 9mm handguns, and I only have one, I feel I should add one more option for us to shoot when we go to the range. She says she is not a fan of the single action grip but we will see.
I think I should just buy option one and be done with it. I could buy it and take possession immediately. I still would not have a 3 screw or have gotten a great deal though. I have no issue buying used when get a good deal.