41 Redhawk with 2.75" Barrel?

I just saw this on Gallery of Guns. None in stock and no picture yet. Round butt grip. Blued.


Kidding about that last part. :twisted:

Yup, there it is. See they have a picture up for the .41M SRH now also; still listed with zero in stock.

I better get out and shoot the 4" .41 Redhawk to see if I need a 2.75" to go with it. Just when I thought I was about done with Redhawks, they go and come out with another one. Maybe they'll re-release the .357M ones as well, I'd buy one just to have "the strongest .357 production revolver."

There are some things you wish you could just 'un-see". This is one of those for me. Darned exclusives. I will never get it all caught up. Oh well, at least I am happy in my broke state :mrgreen: .

32Magfan

I know where you're at. I still owe myself the .45 convertible Redhawk and didn't realize that I might want a .44S FT BH until one was posted here in the classifieds. Luckily, I already have some strong opinions on the ideal barrel length for my enjoyment, so I can cross off most things as "too short" or "too long." But the .41M, as a large-frame snub, well, I need to see if there's a load that might make a place for that...

Never thought I needed a snubbie .4x Magnum until I saw this. I was able to ignore the .44 version as a cool but impractical idea. For some reason the .41 version is really calling my name. This would be the perfect companion to my 6.5" .41 flattop. I think it's just my preference for oddballs. Ruger is doing a good job of helping me support the 2 Million gun challenge!

And to think I just picked up one of the "real Keith" molds from NOE in 41. The stars keep aligning....

Oooops :shock:

Showing 99 available! :shock:

http://www.galleryofguns.com/genie/Default.aspx?item=5034&mfg=Ruger&cat=All&type=All&mdl=Redhawk&cal=41M

Terry T

Groo here
This and the new Henry would just about do me in..........

CHECK THE CLASSIFIEDS

Wow bad timing for me love to have one. ps

There's still plenty of those Davidson's 41 mag redhawks out there. I would rather Ruger made a run of 4.2 redhawks in 357 than this new backpacker.

I wish I had just gone to bed and not got on here tonight. I just ordered one. $875 OTD, best price (on website direct deal) in Middle TN by $25. I don't need this now but they won' t be around again most likely so I jumped while I was feelin' froggy. :mrgreen:

I have the 44 backpacker and it needed another one it's size to play with. :wink:

I may have to throw in 41's too on my handle here...

32Magfan

I am all for an 8 shot .357 Redhawk

Eight??? Heck, I'll raise you one and really get jiggy with it: Nine shot in 327 would be just the thing. :mrgreen: Tied for highest ever capacity in a center fire revolver?? :shock:

I know, just dreaming... The 357 would be an absolute "must buy", I agree.

32Magfan

ceadermtnboy said:

I am all for an 8 shot .357 Redhawk

Click to expand...

I'll second it! Great if they made two lenghts, 4" & 2.75".

32magfan said:

Eight??? Heck, I'll raise you one and really get jiggy with it: Nine shot in 327 would be just the thing. :mrgreen: Tied for highest ever capacity in a center fire revolver?? :shock:

I know, just dreaming... The 357 would be an absolute "must buy", I agree.

32Magfan

Click to expand...

In .327 it would have to be a 9 shot or you would need to put wheels on it to get it around! :mrgreen:
gramps

Backpacker is a misnomer in my opinion. It should be lighter, but isn't at 46 oz! That and the silly 2.75 inch barrel vs a 3 inch barrel killed my desire for one in 44 magnum.
gramps

I'd just like to thank everyone here in advance for refraining from explaining to me why I "need" a .41 magnum Redhawk.