sebtool
Blackhawk
I'm on a mission for Christmas, for my daughter. She doesn't shoot as much as some of us do, and is a bit recoil sensitive to boot. As she's on her own, living in 'the big city', I've always preached situational awareness, and being prepared. (I hate like hell that she lives up there anyway. Kids. :evil Up until a few years ago she didn't really care for shooting handguns, and stuck with a variety of .22 rifles.
2-3 years ago I got her an SR22 Pistol for Christmas, and she loves it, but doesn't shoot it well. A large part of that is the 'FINE' trigger pull. Hell, I can hardly hit what I'm shooting at with it. (Feel free to take pot shots here, I'm used to it! I don't shoot as much as I used to, either... ) If this was 20 yrs ago, I'd say that whoever machined the parts, then fitted this gun together, had nothing to use but stone knives and bear claws. :evil: We've discussed sending it back, but she's not too fond of that idea. I think that when she has another option, that will be an easier sell on my part.
Here's my question. Granted, she needs to shoot more, and I tried the SP101 that my wife 'requisitioned' after she shot it, with .38s. Daughter thought it still had too much recoil, didn't care for it. Over the past 2 years she's been working out, and getting stronger, so I think we might have to revisit the .38s next weekend when she comes down home 'to the country' for Labor Day.
I've been wondering about the .32 H&R mag, and the .327 Federal, in terms of both 'control-ability' and effectiveness. IIRC, the .327 will digest a .32 mag, just like the .357 mag/.38 Spl and .44 mag/.44 Spl, correct? I'm assuming that the .327 has a bit more of a snap to it, but I can't see how it could be too excessive, considering the caliber. I'd imagine that the .32 mag would be pretty pleasant to shoot as well, but I've never had much problem with recoil, either. I'm figuring shoot .32 mags in the .327 until she gets used to it, then move up for a bit more bite. Any info from those with experience in this area?
1 other question regarding the .32/.327. Is the cylinder on the .32 mag long enough to handle a .327 if it was properly reamed? If I can find the right gun in .32 mag, for a decent price, I could handle the modification pretty easily, providing there's enough meat on the cylinder. I'd have to rent a reamer, of course, so it may not be cost effective anyway. Both the .32 and .327 seem to command a bit of a premium though, so for the right deal, it may work out.
Another option I have, but don't really care for, is a nice old 3" Charter Arms Pathfinder in .22 mag that she shoots pretty well. Though it wouldn't have the bite of a .32, it's not an insignificant round, with the right load. The problem there is, it's 1 of my favorite 'throw it in my pocket or on my belt walking in the woods guns'. On top of that, it took me forever to find it, just kind of lucked into it. I've only seen 1 or 2 since then, and they cost at least 2-3x what I paid for this 1. Plus, I'm pretty fond of the 3" barrels on a small revolver, I like the way they handle. 8) Besides, I'll leave it to her in my will, she can have it then!!!! :lol:
Can anyone here shed some words of wisdom in these areas for me?
2-3 years ago I got her an SR22 Pistol for Christmas, and she loves it, but doesn't shoot it well. A large part of that is the 'FINE' trigger pull. Hell, I can hardly hit what I'm shooting at with it. (Feel free to take pot shots here, I'm used to it! I don't shoot as much as I used to, either... ) If this was 20 yrs ago, I'd say that whoever machined the parts, then fitted this gun together, had nothing to use but stone knives and bear claws. :evil: We've discussed sending it back, but she's not too fond of that idea. I think that when she has another option, that will be an easier sell on my part.
Here's my question. Granted, she needs to shoot more, and I tried the SP101 that my wife 'requisitioned' after she shot it, with .38s. Daughter thought it still had too much recoil, didn't care for it. Over the past 2 years she's been working out, and getting stronger, so I think we might have to revisit the .38s next weekend when she comes down home 'to the country' for Labor Day.
I've been wondering about the .32 H&R mag, and the .327 Federal, in terms of both 'control-ability' and effectiveness. IIRC, the .327 will digest a .32 mag, just like the .357 mag/.38 Spl and .44 mag/.44 Spl, correct? I'm assuming that the .327 has a bit more of a snap to it, but I can't see how it could be too excessive, considering the caliber. I'd imagine that the .32 mag would be pretty pleasant to shoot as well, but I've never had much problem with recoil, either. I'm figuring shoot .32 mags in the .327 until she gets used to it, then move up for a bit more bite. Any info from those with experience in this area?
1 other question regarding the .32/.327. Is the cylinder on the .32 mag long enough to handle a .327 if it was properly reamed? If I can find the right gun in .32 mag, for a decent price, I could handle the modification pretty easily, providing there's enough meat on the cylinder. I'd have to rent a reamer, of course, so it may not be cost effective anyway. Both the .32 and .327 seem to command a bit of a premium though, so for the right deal, it may work out.
Another option I have, but don't really care for, is a nice old 3" Charter Arms Pathfinder in .22 mag that she shoots pretty well. Though it wouldn't have the bite of a .32, it's not an insignificant round, with the right load. The problem there is, it's 1 of my favorite 'throw it in my pocket or on my belt walking in the woods guns'. On top of that, it took me forever to find it, just kind of lucked into it. I've only seen 1 or 2 since then, and they cost at least 2-3x what I paid for this 1. Plus, I'm pretty fond of the 3" barrels on a small revolver, I like the way they handle. 8) Besides, I'll leave it to her in my will, she can have it then!!!! :lol:
Can anyone here shed some words of wisdom in these areas for me?