redhawk alaskan and redhawk kodiak

Help Support Ruger Forum:

balin

Bearcat
Joined
Dec 19, 2014
Messages
10
The alaskan is built on the super redhawk frame. The kodiak is built on the redhawk frame. The super redhawk has a cushioned grip system, hammer-forged barrel and an extended frame machined to accept Ruger scope rings.
 

Chuckbuster II

Single-Sixer
Joined
Aug 24, 2014
Messages
269
Location
Jackson County Michigan
Since the Kodiak is on the Redhawks frame I am pretty sure .44 Mag only. With the Alaskan being on the Super Redhawk, .454 Casull and .480 Ruger are both available.

NO scope mount cuts on the Alaskan as there are on "regular" Super Redhawks, front sight is in the way.
 

DPris

Buckeye
Joined
Dec 20, 2003
Messages
1,343
Red has a full conventional steel gripframe and its own single-spring action with one spring powering both hammer & trigger return.

Super Red has the GP action & the GP's abbreviated grip strut frame.

Kodiak will fit in most Alaskan leather.
Denis
 
Joined
Jan 15, 2007
Messages
2,424
Location
The Sticks---N.W. Orygun
Even though the specs show the Alaskan 44 at 45 ounces and the Backpacker 44 at 44 ounces, I think the Alaskan feels like it is about a pound heavier. If I owned both, or ever saw both anyplace at the same time, I would love to put them on a scale and check this. Maybe it is just me, but the Alaskan feels massive in comparison.
 

Varminterror

Blackhawk
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
513
I had all 3 cartridge offerings in the Alaskan until I picked up a Kodiak Backpacker, after which I sold my 44mag Alaskan, as I found the Kodiak to be the better revolver of the two 44mags.

When you compare the Alaskan and the Kodiak backpacker, you're comparing a few different things:

1) Redhawk vs. Super Redhawk Action
2) Redhawk vs. Super Redhawk Gripframe Extension
3) Factory Equipped Grips
4) Potentially 44mag vs. 44mag, OR 44mag vs. 454C or .480R

Ruger Redhawk Kodiak Backpacker 2.75" .44 Remington Magnum
5028.jpg


Ruger Super Redhawk Alaskan 2.5" .44 Remington Magnum
5303.jpg


Ruger Super Redhawk Alaskan 2.5" .454 Casull or .480 Ruger
5301.jpg


1) The Redhawk action is a levered single spring action, whereas the Super Redhawk action is a dual spring design. What does that really mean for the average shooter? Eh, not much. In double action mode, both need a heavy enough hammer spring (mainspring) to give reliable ignition. However, when firing single action, the SRH design can have a lighter break due to the independent trigger return spring. The single spring action can avoid the spring binding and "stacking" feeling to which the dual spring actions are vulnerable. If you don't tune your action and springs, you'd never notice this difference.

The 44mag Redhawk Kodiak Backpacker and 44mag Super Redhawk Alaskan actually use the exact same cylinder assemblies, so there's no difference in action strength between the two.

2) The frame grip extensions are very different between the Redhawk and Super Redhawk. The Redhawk has a traditional exposed frame design, and has a much smaller grip neck than the Super, whereas the Super Redhawk has a "hidden tang" style grip tenon that is fully enclosed by the grips.

3) Coupled with the difference in grip frame design, the Kodiak Backpacker and Alaskan come equipped with markedly different grips. The KB has traditional scales, whereas the Alaskans all come with massive rubberized Hogue grips. Not surprisingly, the Alaskan's rubber grip is nicer for felt recoil.

4) Then you finally get to the cartridge(s) - the Kodiak Backpacker is only available in 44magnum, whereas the Alaskan is available in 44mag, 454c, and 480R. Comparatively, there's not much difference in performance for the 44mag out of either, but the 454C and 480R are much much more powerful in the Alaskan (unavailable in the Kodiak Backpacker Redhawk).
 
Top