Definitely what Dixie and Chuck said. Call 1st and you'll get the free shipping pick up tag for FedEx, no question. You'll have it back in two weeks. It will be taken care of. Some of the early production, mostly 5 1/2" Single Sevens had suffered these common problems and Ruger is very aware of it.
After investigating these legitimate experiences and complaints, I evaluate the Single Seven (S7) issues as follows:
RUGER'S DESIGN:
1. The S7 was not designed specifically for the cylinder to click and register the chambers with the loading gate trough because of these Mechanical realities:
The S7 does not have Ruger's latest engineering development, the "INDEXING PAWL SYSTEM" which is only installed in the New Vaqueros and the New FT Blackhawks.
The S7 and any New Models do not require the hammer to be on the 1/2 cock notch like the old models which does properly position the pawl and therefore cylinder chambers to align with the loading trough like the traditional SA design.
2. However, in the S7 the 7 chamber spacing, instead of 6, due strictly to happenstance, WILL click and align IF the loading trough is correctly machined.
3. Due to the size of the cartridge vs. the small frame size, machining tolerance of the loading trough is much more critical for proper chamber alignment/loading.
CONCLUSIONS:
My conclusions are that Ruger's S7, especially with early S7 production, can have two separate and distinct Loading/unloading problems:
1. The loading trough machining inaccuracy on many S7s can lack in both depth and/or width of the proper side of the trough causing the following:
cartridges can be loaded but chambers do not click and align with the trough as they could, not should, but could.
loading of cartridges is too snug to be user friendly,
and cartridges cannot be loaded at all thru the trough.
2. There's a separate problem, Cylinder chambers can be so undersized to the point that cartridges will not fit in them at all even if they will align thru the loading trough, or even with the cyl removed from the gun.
Assessment of the situation: all of the above can be and has been fixed as experienced by those owners that have sent the S7s back.
FAQ:
Should owners have to send brand new guns back? No, of course not.
Is the issue exasperated by Ruger's decision due to market demand, to supply a revised product not originally intended in the initial design of the single six? I would say so.
Can Ruger overcome the issue? Yes, they have as later S7 production and free repairs have exhibited.