drastic_quench said:
I've read that belt mountain pins make the gun too tight and the forcing cone erodes unevenly over time. Any truth to that?
The truth is more like this:
Mass production firearms are not line bored, therefore they are not as precisely fitted. If the base pin fits perfectly like a custom revolver, any cyl chamber to bore misalignment is accentuated. While a greater tolerance base pin will allow a little 'give' for the bullet to line up better with the forcing cone. That's why forcing cones were invented. There are cases where an accurate production gun actually shoots worse with a replaced, tighter fitting base pin because there's no 'give'.
To say the forcing cone will erode unevenly over time may be technically possible but from a practical reality, should not be a concern in one's lifetime. An immediate drop in accuracy however, is a concern.
Rule of thumb: keep a tight custom gun with all tight parts; keep a production gun with all production parts.
If a gun needs a base pin with greater grasping ability, it either has a fit problem or isn't cleaned regularly enough. A little polishing will cure the fit problem. Personally I've never had to use an after market pin in any of my numerous single actions and consider it a waste of money.
Properly fitting the base pin is just another item on my tuning checklist for any acquired SA, new or used. Same as the base pin latch. If the latch doesn't keep the pin from moving forward under recoil, it's not properly fit. I never compensate for poor fit with heavier springs!
That's why many manufacturer's action springs are usually overly heavy. Tune the parts and lighten the springs; then wear is reduced and longevity of the revolver is increased every time.