I'm of the opinion that a 3" adjustable sight .38 special is a great idea. I find myself shooting more .38 special than .22LR these days, as I refuse to pay scalper prices for 22LR. I can hand load .38 special for less than the $5.00 for a 50 count box that the scalpers are getting for .22LR. There hasn't been a box of 22LR seen in a retail store in quite a long time.
The mountain men had their "possibles bag", the dough boys their "kit bag", and now the preppers, "the bug out bag". A 3" adjustable sight revolver is a great "kit gun". Smith and Wesson produced such a revolver in the 1990s as a 3" model 36 and later the model 60. When it became possible to chamber the J frame in .357 magnum, the .38s went away.
Some bemoan that the adjustable sights and barrel length negate concealed carry. Agreed, concealed carry is not this gun's forte. It is a kit gun. A gun you stash in a tackle box, a tool box, the grub box of your camp kitchen, etc…and open carry while on the trail.
Some bemoan the .38 special chamber. Not me. Who needs the blast and recoil of the .357 in a "J" frame? Not me either. If I need more power I carry a .44 special or a .45 colt. A .38 special is perfectly capable for rabbits, squirrel and grouse. A .357 magnum is too much of a good thing in a J frame…my opinion.
The .357 magnum model will be heavier, due to the steel frame and less aggressive cylinder fluting. Marketing hype being what it is, this 3" LCRx is still a sub one pound revolver. The steel frame models won't be.
My wife claimed my S&W when she learned to shoot. Her hands are small and only a J frame will fit. I want one of these to replace the Smith.
This model is proof that Ruger does listen to the "Tell the CEO", I suggested it, I'm sure others did too.
A .22LR model will be a grand addition to this model, if we ever see ammo again.