I know this subject has been discussed ad nauseam, but has there ever been an actual case where someone was charged or convicted of a bad shoot solely on the basis of having removed their SR9's magazine disconnect?
It may be all in my head, but I'll swear my SR9 operates a little smoother without it. But I do use the gun for home defense so would like to know if it's really that important legally or more of a forum subject.
I am not trying to start yet another "remove it or leave it in" discussion, just trying to learn of any actual cases. I can't find any and wonder if anyone else has.
It may be all in my head, but I'll swear my SR9 operates a little smoother without it. But I do use the gun for home defense so would like to know if it's really that important legally or more of a forum subject.
I am not trying to start yet another "remove it or leave it in" discussion, just trying to learn of any actual cases. I can't find any and wonder if anyone else has.
