I was aware of that although I would think that Ruger, based on it's reputation would produce a more durable item than Keltec. Perhaps I'm wrong. I do take the carry a lot shoot a little attitude with the LCP. Dongramps said:PS The Keltec is what Ruger copied to get the LCP.
I have an LCP, and don't find it unpleasant to shoot. Of course I don't shoot more than 20 rounds at a session. That comes after I have put close to 100 rounds of .44 mag down range. :mrgreen: 8)22/45 Fan said:Those guns (the LCP and P3AT) are so unpleasant to shoot that I expect the owner will wear out long before the guns do.
22/45 Fan said:Those guns (the LCP and P3AT) are so unpleasant to shoot that I expect the owner will wear out long before the guns do.
louchia said:I've had 3 LCP Gen 2. Each failed at about 1000 rnds. after the third, I asked Ruger to replace it with an LCP II. They did so at no charge.
With each of the first 3 LCP the metal frame insert cracked.All I ever ran was name brand 115gr range ammo.
DonD said:22/45 Fan said:Those guns (the LCP and P3AT) are so unpleasant to shoot that I expect the owner will wear out long before the guns do.
I don't find it at all unpleasant to shoot. Considering the limited number of rounds I've put through it, I'm also very pleased with my accuracy. Don
22/45 Fan said:Those guns (the LCP and P3AT) are so unpleasant to shoot that I expect the owner will wear out long before the guns do.