I wish Ruger had installed a manual safety
I think they may wish this as well in due time.
I wish Ruger had installed a manual safety
USMCXD said:Saddened, but it sounds like I won't be adding one of these LCP-2's to my Ruger family.
Too many bugs and weirdness for me. I can handle an occasional hiccup, but this all sounds like acid reflux disease going on. Good luck everyone who owns one. Stay safe and watch your ejections.
NEXT...!!!!
FergusonTO35 said:My late model LCP I has been a very good $200.00 pistol. That said I am not going to even seriously consider the LCP II. It seems like once again Ruger spent years getting the bugs out of the original to the point that they are usually 100% out of the box and most buyers are quite happy. Then, Ruger rolls out a replacement which offers some improvements but at the expense of more years of returns and revisions.
I had high hopes for the next LCP, which I assumed would be striker fired with a decent trigger pull, real sights, and a passive firing pin safety. And maybe the brass would land in the same zip code. Instead, we got a gun with a better trigger pull and grip but a fully cocked hammer with no firing pin safety and most of the same problems the LCP had the first time around.
FergusonTO35 said:Thanks, and good luck to you going forward. I'm going to let my sister have the LCP if she likes it. Her current carry gun is a P95 believe it or not. She loves that big ol' tank of a pistol but something smaller would be ideal.