gmartinnc said:
Slow motion video of a Glock fired in a Ransom Rest. Saw it on another site and remembered this thread.
http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2014/03/13/slow-motion-glock-frame-flexing/
... which means absolutely nothing.
I shouldn't be, but I'm surprised that here it is - 2014 - and guys are still talking about Glocks as if they are a fad. :lol:
Look, I love a beautiful 1911 as much as anyone. But, with Glock having made the name Glock synonomous with reliability it's hard to believe that some people are still pretending that this is not an established fact.
Guys, when Larry Vickers says that he prefers the Glock for his own use, and has actually taken to teasing the 1911 die-hards ... maybe it's time to take a serious and honest look at what's been going on since the 1980s? If you don't know who Larry Vickers is ... google his name. The man knows more about firearms, and fighting with them in combat, and what works, than most anyone alive.
Love your 1911 for what it is. A symbol ... or a beautiful piece of workmanship ... or whatever. But please don't pretend that they are some hallmark of reliability. That's just laughable. Talk to anyone who conducts combat pistol training, they'll tell you that the guys who have trouble with their pistols during a 3-day course, firing 1000 rounds, will almost always be the 1911 guys. Especially the guys who've had them "tuned."
For that matter, talk to guys who have been armorers in our military. The 1911, after firing under 50,000 rounds, is almost always needing refitting and other work.
On the other hand, there are Glocks out there which have gone 1,000,000 rounds without even a spring change.
If you hate polymer pistols because of aesthetics, fine. Just say so. But please don't pretend that polymer pistols haven't proven themselves capable of doing everything the beloved steel pistols have done ... with a whole lot less breaking down. - DixieBoy