hellokittyglock
Bearcat
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2014
- Messages
- 3
Tell me the good, the bad and the ugly on it. I traded my diamondback 380 for it as I no longer needed it.
I have the G26, G23, G19, G42 and G30S.roylt said:Welcome.
What type of glock do you have?
How did this shift over to GLOCK??????????????????? As for the OP's question the LC9 is a well made and designed little pistol. It is accurate but takes some practice with the trigger to become proficient. This is a review of the LC9: http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2011/03/robert-farago/gun-review-ruger-lc9/hellokittyglock said:Tell me the good, the bad and the ugly on it. I traded my diamondback 380 for it as I no longer needed it.
Some excellent observations on this most excellent defense tool.bada61265 said:one way or another no matter what gun, you have to learn the trigger. the trigger pull is longer than a striker fired pistol, but lighter at 6lbs than many striker fired pistols. mine has lightened considerably over the first 500 rounds or so. the good, reliable well built and accurate (imo very for a pocket pistol) the bad, its a pocket pistol that gets mistaken for a range gun, keep in mind its a concealed carry design and made for relatively close range defense. the trigger is probably the most difficult feature to some. to others its great and a comfort when shoving the gun into a pocket. the frame safety is a non issue IMO, it is not nearly as hard to operate as some make it out to be. i choose to leave my safety off at all times, as i train with a xdm also i don't want to train for a safety on one gun then not on the other. i also think its not needed for this design. to each his own.