FergusonTO35
Hunter
Spin? That's my sincere belief.
And your belief is dead in. Charging more than it's worth to make it seem better than it is is done in all industries. This was exposed in that book a few years ago about Glock. They charged more than they needed to because they believed the public would think it was junk if it was inexpensive. If Ruger put a 500$ price tag on SR pistols from the beginning, public opinion would be different.FergusonTO35 said:Spin? That's my sincere belief.
Beetmagnet said:If Ruger put a 500$ price tag on SR pistols from the beginning, public opinion would be different.FergusonTO35 said:Spin? That's my sincere belief.
.
revhigh said:Beetmagnet said:If Ruger put a 500$ price tag on SR pistols from the beginning, public opinion would be different.FergusonTO35 said:Spin? That's my sincere belief.
.
....and nobody would buy them ....
REV
revhigh said:Yeah ... yeah ... yeah .... Just another emotional and hysterical Al James post rife with 5-10 year old misinformation attacking the messenger rather than discussing the subject. It's just an Internet forum where people discuss ideas ... Other peoples' opinions and experiences are going to differ from yours ... Get over it.
REV
Mike J said:I would probably be interested in a SR9c or SR40c if they didn't have the poorly designed magazine disconnect.
Mike J said:I would probably be interested in a SR9c or SR40c if they didn't have the poorly designed magazine disconnect.
Al James said:Mike J said:I would probably be interested in a SR9c or SR40c if they didn't have the poorly designed magazine disconnect.
Yes it is a poor design. Thank goodness it is made to be removed in a few minutes. If I was worried about the legal ramifications of removing the MD it would have been a deal killer for me on the SR series. I have removed them from every SR that I have owned during the initial fieldstrip/cleaning.
I'm confused, you have (3) SR9s which have the most comfortable grip of all the poly guns but you carry a Glock. What am I missing here ?Beetmagnet said:And your belief is dead in. Charging more than it's worth to make it seem better than it is is done in all industries. This was exposed in that book a few years ago about Glock. They charged more than they needed to because they believed the public would think it was junk if it was inexpensive. If Ruger put a 500$ price tag on SR pistols from the beginning, public opinion would be different.FergusonTO35 said:Spin? That's my sincere belief.
Personally I love the gun. I think it has the best feeling grip of all the polymer guns.I have 3 SR9s. But, I carry a Glock. The safety, mag disconnect (I took all mine out), and LCI annoy me. I dont know why Ruger doesn't offer non-lawyered up guns in gun friendly states. The number one reason I hear from other shooters at competitions as to why they don't buy a Ruger SR pistol is the presence of a external safety. It sucks that lawyers hold back good ideas, but that's life.
Ale-8(1) said:If you are happy with your SR and it works well for you, don't let others' commentary bother you.
The world is full of gun snobs. Ignore 'em.