OM BKH42 Found Today

Help Support Ruger Forum:

lovemydals

Buckeye
Joined
Nov 21, 2006
Messages
1,142
Location
Northern California
While at the range today, one of the fellows in a training class that I was assisting with had a Old Model Blackhawk .41 mag, s/n 3336. What I found interesting is that it was issued to him during his tour of duty in Vietnam. I had asked him if he had bought it new & that is when he said it was issued to him. I've known that military personal in Vietnam carried non traditional military firearms of the period (personal firearms), but being issued a Ruger Blackhawk .41 mag doesn't seem possible. Can anyone shed some light on this? Thanks!

lmd
 

deserttrans

Buckeye
Joined
Dec 17, 2007
Messages
1,211
Location
Arizona
I was with the USMC 68-69-70. Seen personal 357 Blackhawks and a Rat in our platoon had a RST4. I would say that a official issue Blackhawk did not happen. JMHO
 

contender

Ruger Guru
Joined
Sep 18, 2002
Messages
25,402
Location
Lake Lure NC USA
I once asked a very senior (and knowledgable) official at Ruger about any military contracts on any Single-Actions. I was told, "No."
However, your friend most likely had a unit armorer who had one and he was able to "issue" it to him as it wasn't something standard, and the armorer wanted rid of it.
 

flattop44

Buckeye
Joined
Mar 2, 2000
Messages
1,270
Location
Tennessee
Hope he had a good supply of cartridges issued with it, sure would have been hard to find any .41 Mag. ammo in Nam!!
FT44
 

radicalrod

Hunter
Joined
Jan 9, 2004
Messages
3,567
Location
Bowling Green, Oh
OK I don't want to be picky but isn't a BN42 a NM not an OM.....should read BKH42 with that serial number.....I am easily confused so please excuse me if I am off base :lol: :lol: :lol: I bought a Light Weight Single Six from a guy that took it to NAM with him.....still had the beat up old box and everything :D :D :D see ya RR.
 

lovemydals

Buckeye
Joined
Nov 21, 2006
Messages
1,142
Location
Northern California
RR,

Good catch! Oops! :oops: I was so focused on remembering the s/n, that I didn't even think to verify the model number before submitting the post. It was several hours after leaving the range before posting & I had not written down the s/n while at the range. It's Ok to continue to be easily confused (though I doubt you are easily confused). But, no need to worry about being off base. :lol: I appreciate any opportunity to learn something new. Thanks!

lmd

PS. Just for the record, I never questioned the owner of this Blackhawk on how he obtained it. My post was to obtain more information on this topic & hear what others might think or know. Thanks everyone for your comments!

PSS. I corrected the subject line to reflect the correct model number.
 

41 nut

Bearcat
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
87
Location
Northern Maine
If it was an official military issue revolver it would have an inspectors initials stamped on it and be marked US Property. Most likely was one someone smuggled over with them and didn't dare try to smuggle back home so he left it with the unit armor. There were plenty of personally owned firearms in country when I was there in 69 to 70. Ammo would be the biggest problem with owning a 41mag there.
 

americal

Hunter
Joined
Feb 19, 2009
Messages
2,174
Location
Alabama, Athens
A while ago I posted about a sniper who came out on a re-supply chopper to my company he was carrying a 357 protected sight BlackHawk it was his personal gun--we talked, it looked weird over there HA!!! I had a early SC6 at home.
 

chet15

Hawkeye
Joined
Jan 22, 2001
Messages
6,005
Location
Dawson, Iowa
There were a lot of Ruger's over there taken as personal weapons. We have a 31xxx range BKH-34 .357 flattop that spent time over there as well.
Chet15
 

UmpquaCharlie

Buckeye
Joined
Mar 23, 2008
Messages
1,384
Location
SW Oregon
I spent a year tramping the Central Highlands with the 173rd Airborne never saw a Ruger just a few private handguns ...Colt, Smith and Remington. Usually they were 45 ACP's
Charlie
 
Top