Have gotten a few Bearcat cylinders in for throating, and also some complaints about not wanting to chamber certain brands of 22LR ammo.
I am finding these cylinders are not chambered at all, they are straight through bored in the vicinity of .2257" to .2262" or roughly thereabouts, with no taper, no hint of a chamber whatsoever.
This leaves me with the question of do I ream this cylinder so it will accept factory ammo? The Manson finishing reamer won't go very far into the back of the chamber, so this tells me it is going to remove quite a bit of metal, which will cure the finicky ammo issue, BUT.. This then leaves the cylinder with oversize throats, and accuracy is likely to suffer severely because of it.
Will Ruger address these cylinders and replace them with a cylinder that isn't shotgun bored straight through? I hate to waste a customer's money reaming a cylinder that is only going to shoot but so good with .226" throats.
I am finding these cylinders are not chambered at all, they are straight through bored in the vicinity of .2257" to .2262" or roughly thereabouts, with no taper, no hint of a chamber whatsoever.
This leaves me with the question of do I ream this cylinder so it will accept factory ammo? The Manson finishing reamer won't go very far into the back of the chamber, so this tells me it is going to remove quite a bit of metal, which will cure the finicky ammo issue, BUT.. This then leaves the cylinder with oversize throats, and accuracy is likely to suffer severely because of it.
Will Ruger address these cylinders and replace them with a cylinder that isn't shotgun bored straight through? I hate to waste a customer's money reaming a cylinder that is only going to shoot but so good with .226" throats.