Cast bullets labeled .358" 180gr. TC, but weigh 170?

Help Support Ruger Forum:

dgang

Bearcat
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
18
Location
Colorado Springs
Uncovered a stash of ABC cast bullets from years ago. They are labeled .358" 180gr. TC but weigh 170. gr.  Would a high alloy mix account for 10 gr. of weight? Do I load for 180gr. or 170gr.? Planning on using 13 gr. of 2400. Sound right?
Thanks in advance, dgang
 

Paul B

Hunter
Joined
Dec 4, 1999
Messages
2,145
Location
Tucson, AZ
Yes, the composition of the alloy can make a noticeable difference in the weight of a bullet. For example, I have an RCBS mold for a 250 gr. .375 caliber bullet. RCBS bases their bullet weight on IIRC, linotype metal. My alloy which has a higher lead content than linotype cast out at 270 gr. which is fine by me. Looks to me like your bullets have a fairly high tin content which would explain the lighter weight.
Paul B.
 

Rick Courtright

Hawkeye
Joined
Mar 10, 2002
Messages
7,897
Location
Redlands CA USA
Hi,

That weight difference works out to be about 5%, which is probably within the range of alloy differences (in this case, as already noted, yours would be higher in antimony and/or tin than what the mould maker used when developing the mould.)

For recipes, if you have some for 170s, you should be ok. It's generally accepted that in cases like this with small variations in bullet weight you can load a lighter bullet with the next heavier bullet recipe, so your 180 data should work, too. In any case, don't go the other way: for example, DO NOT try to extrapolate 158 gr recipes. All this assumes, of course, reputable published data. Remember, start low, work up with ANY change in the recipe.

Rick C
 

mikld

Blackhawk
Joined
Apr 22, 2009
Messages
947
Location
Oregon
Yep alloy does make a big difference in finished bullet weight. Basically the more lead in the alloy, the heavier the bullets will be. A bullet of 97% lead 2% tin and 1% other stuff (antimony, arsenic, etc.) will be much heavier than a bullet of linotype alloy, 84% lead, 12% antimony and 4% tin...
 

Biggfoot44

Blackhawk
Joined
Sep 6, 2009
Messages
829
What everybody said .

Making me feel old know , but back in the medium day , I purchased .358 nominal 180gr T/C bullets from Nat'l Bullet Co .

A whole lot of Commercial Casting companies use the equipment mfg by Magma Engineering . Other brands of molds can often be adapted , but a whole buncha Bullet mfg use the molds made by Magma Engineering , and many of their designs can be easily recognized.

And the seeming digression leads us into the fact the Magma 180 T/C was apparently spec'ed with somthing like 1:20 Lead/ Tin , because with modern " hard cast" alloy, they all weigh 10-12gr less .

Not even a slam on the bullet design, or Nat'l Bullet . The design performed as expected for cast T/C , with good accuracy. They just weighed 169gr instead of 180 .
 

GP100man

Buckeye
Joined
Sep 13, 2006
Messages
1,386
Location
Tabor City, NC.
Shooting lead I worry more over dia. of the boolit than the weight .

Cast size/lube then load accordingly.

You`re safe using loads for 180 lead boolit loads NOT jacketed bullets !!

Lead seals the chamber & barrel better & using starting jacketed loads will put you at or the least close to max loads using lead.

By the weight/358" I`m assuming 357 magnum ???


GP100man
 

magpouch

Single-Sixer
Joined
Jul 24, 2011
Messages
161
Location
Maine
Could be your scale is not properly calibrated too. Or is "off" somewhat at that particular weight. Something rare but possible especially if you are using an electronic scale.
 
Top