RugerForum.com Forum Index RugerForum.com
This is a Ruger Firearms enthusiast's forum, but it is in no way affiliated with,
nor does it represent Sturm Ruger & Company Inc. of Southport, CT.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Lead-bullet ban update
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RugerForum.com Forum Index -> Gun Control and Other Political Issues
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
wolfsong
Hunter


Joined: 20 Dec 2005
Posts: 2698
Location: Sierra foothills, Ca. U.S.A.

PostPosted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 11:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jimbo, I give up. Despite the fact that no judge was involved in enacting the no lead bill, despite the fact that there is no consensus among the parties that lead bullets are poisoning the condors, despite the fact that there is no conclusive scientific evidence indicating such, you cannot accept the truth. My dislike or approval of the current California administration and Obama being the president has nothing to do with this thread. You are the only one who mentioned those items. Somehoe, it is mind boggling to me that, despite obvious information to the contrary, you cannot accept the truth and you insist on saying "yeah, but..." at every turn, in spite of the facts. There is absolutely no sense or reason to discuss this topic with you. You can't accept the truth, the facts. Instead, you insist that your opinion is in fact the truth. My God. This explains a lot about your views on the world around us. Doesn't lend much towards establishing your credibility. Peace and God bless, Wolfsong.
_________________
Ford - Free Of Radical Democrats.
"He's just a romping, stomping patriot."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
pps
Blackhawk


Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 518
Location: PRK

PostPosted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 10:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

wolfsong wrote:
Jimbo, I give up. Despite the fact that no judge was involved in enacting the no lead bill, despite the fact that there is no consensus among the parties that lead bullets are poisoning the condors, despite the fact that there is no conclusive scientific evidence indicating such, you cannot accept the truth. My dislike or approval of the current California administration and Obama being the president has nothing to do with this thread. You are the only one who mentioned those items. Somehoe, it is mind boggling to me that, despite obvious information to the contrary, you cannot accept the truth and you insist on saying "yeah, but..." at every turn, in spite of the facts. There is absolutely no sense or reason to discuss this topic with you. You can't accept the truth, the facts. Instead, you insist that your opinion is in fact the truth. My God. This explains a lot about your views on the world around us. Doesn't lend much towards establishing your credibility. Peace and God bless, Wolfsong.


Wolf,

Jimbo, like most libs, worships government. It's an issue of faith with him that government is always altruistic, right and holy...so long as liberals/socialists are in charge. Facts that run contrary to his religion/faith are ignored or dismissed.
_________________
Whether the promise is fulfilled is irrelevant.

CD Fingers....reciting the anthem of the left.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
badgerrr
Single-Sixer


Joined: 09 Dec 2002
Posts: 321

PostPosted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 11:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

"You really can't lump compounds like lead chromate and lead oxide in with metallic lead if you are looking for accuracy, even if the word lead is used. "

Thank you, Leadeye, for speaking to the crux of this situation.

Table salt is Sodium Chloride. That means it's made from a flammable/explosive metal and World War One era poison gas. Table salt is neither.

Attacking metallic lead because poisonous compounds can be created from it is, if not absurd, just plain wrong headed.

This attempted lead bullet ban is just more evidence that the current environmentalism is primarily a Red Herring - a pretext - to enact restrictive laws that could never be passed on their own merits.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MD
Buckeye


Joined: 29 Jul 2007
Posts: 1021

PostPosted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 11:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's amazing we never had an environmental catastrophe from all of the lead shot everywhere during the Revolutionary and Civil Wars.

Shocked Wink
_________________
Regards - MD

NRA Patron Member
NRA Certified Pistol Instructor
Trout Whisperer Smile

V-ote
O-ut
T-yranny
E-verywhere
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jimbo357mag
Hunter


Joined: 22 Feb 2007
Posts: 4128
Location: So. Florida

PostPosted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 11:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

wolfsong wrote:
Jimbo, I give up. Despite the fact that no judge was involved in enacting the no lead bill, despite the fact that there is no consensus among the parties that lead bullets are poisoning the condors, despite the fact that there is no conclusive scientific evidence indicating such, you cannot accept the truth.


Both the California lead bullet ban and the current effort in Arizona to ban lead bullets are a direct result of lawsuits brought into court to protect the Condor, an endangered species. The endangered species act is federal law and a powerful tool used to prohibit many activities.

http://www.calgunlaws.com/index.php/current-litigation/82-cases-litigation/884-nra-makes-lead-ammo-banners-back-off-from-endangered-species-act-lawsuit-.html

quote> NRA MAKES LEAD AMMO BANNERS BACK OFF FROM ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT LAWSUIT
Written by C D Michel
Monday, 07 June 2010 12:31
Phoenix, Arizona: Responding to court papers filed by the National Rifle Association (NRA) in opposition to legal claims brought by the Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), on Friday June 4, 2010 CBD revised its lawsuit against the U.S. Bureau of Land Management and the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (BLM, FWS) regarding BLM and FWS’ management of federal lands in northern Arizona (Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Bureau of Land Mgmt, et al., 3:09-cv-08011-PCT-PGR). <end quote

Just because you say no judge or court was involved doesn't make it so, neither does your insistence that there are no facts. There are facts and there is interpretation of the facts and they have not been going well for hunters. Shocked

...Jimbo
_________________
"The wind blows so hard the ocean gets up on its hind legs and walks right across the land."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Jimbo357mag
Hunter


Joined: 22 Feb 2007
Posts: 4128
Location: So. Florida

PostPosted: Thu Jul 29, 2010 12:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

badgerrr wrote:
...Attacking metallic lead because poisonous compounds can be created from it is, if not absurd, just plain wrong headed.

This attempted lead bullet ban is just more evidence that the current environmentalism is primarily a Red Herring - a pretext - to enact restrictive laws that could never be passed on their own merits.


Wrong, animals, birds in particular, that eat lead show elevated lead levels in their blood. Many Condors and Eagles have died because of lead poisoning. The evidence is a little sketchy that there is a direct link to hunters but not that they are ingesting lead and dying.

This whole lead bullet thing is not going well for hunters and even the EPA is looking to ban lead bullets and sinkers. It would be wise for shooters of all types to educate themselves on the subject so as to not be caught un-awares. BTW there is even a national petition to ban lead bullets and sinkers. A Google search will reveal a host of anti-lead groups. Shocked

...Jimbo
_________________
"The wind blows so hard the ocean gets up on its hind legs and walks right across the land."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
wolfsong
Hunter


Joined: 20 Dec 2005
Posts: 2698
Location: Sierra foothills, Ca. U.S.A.

PostPosted: Thu Jul 29, 2010 1:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Geez, now it's eagles. So now eagles are eating carrion in sufficient amounts as to suffer the same malady as the scavenger condor? Do you know the difference between birds of prey and scavengers? Never mind, don't answer. BTW, the lawsuits were settled out of court. NO JUDGE. Whatever gets you through the night, Jimbo. Peace and God bless, Wolfsong.
_________________
Ford - Free Of Radical Democrats.
"He's just a romping, stomping patriot."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Jimbo357mag
Hunter


Joined: 22 Feb 2007
Posts: 4128
Location: So. Florida

PostPosted: Thu Jul 29, 2010 10:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

wolfsong wrote:
...BTW, the lawsuits were settled out of court. NO JUDGE. Whatever gets you through the night, Jimbo. Peace and God bless, Wolfsong.


OK, I have to retract my statements about a JUDGE or court order.

...But there is a law:
AB821, written by Assemblyman Pedro Nava, D-Santa Barbara

...And the agreement with FGC was rendered moot.

http://www.vcstar.com/news/2007/oct/14/governor-oks-lead-bullet-ban/

quote> On Friday, the staff of the Fish and Game Commission recommended a ban be implemented, but suggested it apply to a smaller area than that which is covered by the new law.

"What's confusing is the governor's willingness to take a resource question out of the hands of the commission," Gaines said. "The Legislature doesn't have to make decisions based on science. The commission was the appropriate forum."

Commission President Richard Rogers of Carpinteria, who had written Schwarzenegger requesting a veto, said the governor's action renders moot "literally thousands of hours of work" conducted by the commission staff. <end quote

...So we are both right. Your point that an out of court agreement was reached is true. My point that these actions were brought about by lawsuits in court heard before a judge, is also true.

...But the law trumps both and makes the whole argument about how we got there moot. Very Happy

...Jimbo
_________________
"The wind blows so hard the ocean gets up on its hind legs and walks right across the land."


Last edited by Jimbo357mag on Fri Jul 30, 2010 6:06 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Leadeye
Bearcat


Joined: 12 Aug 2008
Posts: 43
Location: Indiana

PostPosted: Thu Jul 29, 2010 10:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Again I will say that I would have to look at the extraction study data.

How was the test run to determine elevated lead levels? AA? How many and what other types of heavy metals showed up in the analysis?

Lead chromate was used for years to paint yellow stripes on highways all over this country. Lead carbonate was the white paint pigment used on buildings that set off initial lead paint legislation years ago. Tetra ethyl lead is still used in Avgas. These people have a lot more work to do before jumping to a conclusion.

"Sketchy" data really has no place in decision making. Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Doug.38PR
Single-Sixer


Joined: 10 Oct 2007
Posts: 192
Location: Somewhere between El Paso TX and Charleston SC

PostPosted: Thu Jul 29, 2010 10:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

just about all I ever shoot are lead round nose bullets or at least semi-jacketed lead tiped bullets out of my .38 Special, .45 Long Colt and .357 Magnum guns.
the .38 Special and .357 Magnum I probably shoot more than any other round in my collection. Don't care for jacketed ammo in these guns.

If Ka lifornia wants to ban lead because some dang bird might get sick, makes no nevermind to me, they seem to delight in banning anything and everything that makes life life in order to make a perfect world in their own image.
But if they start telling me what I can and can't shoot (and I'm sure their are some limp wristed transplants down in Baton Rouge who want to)....I'll hand over my lead bullets to them....at 755-1400 ft per second!
_________________
"Is it not strange that the descendants of those pilgrim fathers who Crossed the Atlantic to preserve their own freedom of opinion, have always proved themselves intolerant of the Spiritual liberty of others?" Robert E. Lee, Dec 27, 1856

"Never be haughty to the humble, nor humble to the haughty."
Jefferson Davis

"All we ask, is to be left alone."
Jefferson Davis, 1861
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jimbo357mag
Hunter


Joined: 22 Feb 2007
Posts: 4128
Location: So. Florida

PostPosted: Thu Jul 29, 2010 11:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Leadeye wrote:
Again I will say that I would have to look at the extraction study data.

How was the test run to determine elevated lead levels? AA? How many and what other types of heavy metals showed up in the analysis?

Lead chromate was used for years to paint yellow stripes on highways all over this country. Lead carbonate was the white paint pigment used on buildings that set off initial lead paint legislation years ago. Tetra ethyl lead is still used in Avgas. These people have a lot more work to do before jumping to a conclusion.

"Sketchy" data really has no place in decision making. Very Happy


I don't know any of the technical stuff about how they got their results but I did see several statements by several individuals that said that many of the birds blood lead levels were very elevated and that some of bird deaths, and they estimated up to half of the deaths, were from lead poisoning.

I don't want to see lead bullets banned any more than the next guy and I don't think sketchy data should be used either but the environmentalists are using the courts and lawmakers to push their agenda. They may only have the animals best interest at heart but they are willing to push very hard to ban lead bullets and other lead products and they really don't care how accurate the data or information is, only that it helps their position.

This is where CD's proposal comes into play. Something like a complete ban of lead hunting bullets may be the only way to save lead bullets for the others. I would hate to see that, but you only have to look at what is happening on a national level to see that might be an alternative. A complete lead bullet ban by the EPA is not out of the question. Shocked Sad

...Jimbo
_________________
"The wind blows so hard the ocean gets up on its hind legs and walks right across the land."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
wolfsong
Hunter


Joined: 20 Dec 2005
Posts: 2698
Location: Sierra foothills, Ca. U.S.A.

PostPosted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 12:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jimbo, environmentalists filed a suit to ban lead bullets in the condor's range, Nava introduced AB821, despite the F & G Commission's objections Arnold signed ot into law, the F & G Commission then took it upon themselves to EXPAND the area affected by the initial ban - to include the condor's "historical" range, where there haven't been condors in well over 100 years - and here we are. The Endangered Species Act did not weigh as much of a factor in bringing this about. Pressure from environmentalist groups, along with dubious "scientific" data (paid for by said environmentalist groups - go figure) caused Arnold to cave. And the ironic thing is, the condors are still dying. Go figure. What is moot is due process, you know - the liberal's way of telling others what is best while having nothing concrete to support their theories\agendas. But, like I said earlier, whatever gets you through the night. Peace and God bless, Wolfsong.
_________________
Ford - Free Of Radical Democrats.
"He's just a romping, stomping patriot."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
pps
Blackhawk


Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 518
Location: PRK

PostPosted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 1:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wolf, you are wasting your breath. The way you and I trust in God, Jimbo and the rest of the left trust in their god (the federal government). Facts mean nothing, especially if said facts fly in the face of their god.
_________________
Whether the promise is fulfilled is irrelevant.

CD Fingers....reciting the anthem of the left.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jimbo357mag
Hunter


Joined: 22 Feb 2007
Posts: 4128
Location: So. Florida

PostPosted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 5:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

pps wrote:
Wolf, you are wasting your breath. The way you and I trust in God, Jimbo and the rest of the left trust in their god (the federal government). Facts mean nothing, especially if said facts fly in the face of their god.

Another in a long line of ridicules statements. This is typical of the folks that like to burry their heads in the sand concerning environmental issues and then shout ridicules stuff from way out in left field somewhere. Shocked

...Jimbo
_________________
"The wind blows so hard the ocean gets up on its hind legs and walks right across the land."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Jimbo357mag
Hunter


Joined: 22 Feb 2007
Posts: 4128
Location: So. Florida

PostPosted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 5:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

wolfsong wrote:
Jimbo, environmentalists filed a suit to ban lead bullets in the condor's range, Nava introduced AB821, despite the F & G Commission's objections Arnold signed ot into law, the F & G Commission then took it upon themselves to EXPAND the area affected by the initial ban - to include the condor's "historical" range, where there haven't been condors in well over 100 years - and here we are. The Endangered Species Act did not weigh as much of a factor in bringing this about. Pressure from environmentalist groups, along with dubious "scientific" data (paid for by said environmentalist groups - go figure) caused Arnold to cave. And the ironic thing is, the condors are still dying. Go figure. What is moot is due process, you know - the liberal's way of telling others what is best while having nothing concrete to support their theories\agendas. But, like I said earlier, whatever gets you through the night. Peace and God bless, Wolfsong.


Seems to me the DFG adopted the exact same area that was defined in the law.

http://www.varminter.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=12470

quote>
Where
The geographic area where lead is prohibited is exactly the same area described in the recently enacted AB 821- Ridley-Tree Condor Preservation Act (Nava) and entered into the Fish and Game Code as section 3004.5. To assist hunters in understanding and visualizing affected areas, the lead prohibition area is also know as deer hunt zones D7, D8, D9, D10, D11, D13, and most (but not all) of the South A zone. (The Department will identify specific hunts affected in a future update.)
<end quote


The BILL ANALYSIS AB 821

http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/asm/ab_0801-0850/ab_821_cfa_20070409_160734_asm_comm.html

The bill analysis goes into a lot of detail and is worth looking at. Some new studies are in this bill analysis

quote>
4)Studies on lead and condors : In 2006, three new studies were
released on condors and lead. The most recent study of note
is an isotope study conducted by a team of scientists from the
University of California at Santa Cruz, Stanford University
and others, which was published in the journal Environmental
Science and Technology. The study linked the lead isotope
compositions in condors to the lead isotopes in ammunition
samples. The study concluded that incidental ingestion of
ammunition in carcasses of animals killed by hunters is the
principal source of elevated lead exposures threatening the
recovery of condors in the wild.

Another study released in 2006 conducted tests on condors at the
condor release site near Big Sur, CA. This study, which was
conducted by scientists with the Ventana Wildlife Society,
tested 126 blood samples from 33 free-flying condors between
1998 and 2006. The study found that blood lead levels of
condors were higher in the months of September and October,
which is deer hunting season, than other times of year. One
condor from the Big Sur population died in southern California
due to lead poisoning and 2 additional birds were treated for
acute lead poisoning. Blood lead levels were also found to be
significantly higher in released birds after only one year in
the wild.

A third study conducted in 2006 by the Peregrine Fund and the
Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Pathology at
Washington State University compared bullet fragments in
rifle-killed deer with deer killed with copper bullets. The
study found over 90% of samples of deer killed with lead-based
bullets contained lead fragments, while only 6 fragments were
found in 4 whole deer killed with copper bullets, suggesting a
high potential for scavenger exposure to lead .
<end quote

So there is more for folks to digest or to ignore and then complain about. Shocked Shocked Sad

...Jimbo
_________________
"The wind blows so hard the ocean gets up on its hind legs and walks right across the land."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RugerForum.com Forum Index -> Gun Control and Other Political Issues All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Page 5 of 8

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group