Japenese Carriers

Help Support Ruger Forum:

caryc

Hawkeye
Joined
Jan 31, 2004
Messages
8,520
Location
Southern California
I keep seeing pictures of Japanese aircraft carriers with the turned up noses on the end of their flight decks to get that plane started up quickly. Why hasn't anything like that appeared on our carriers? What do you pilots here have to say about it. Good idea or not? Nevermind, I found my answer. It is kind of interesting if you care to read it.

https://www.navylookout.com/royal-navy-aircraft-carrier-ski-jumps-a-history/
 
  • Like
Reactions: g5m

Bob Wright

Hawkeye
Joined
Jun 24, 2004
Messages
7,851
Location
Memphis, TN USA
The British Harrier could not take off vertcally with an ordnance load, so their carriers had that ramp to get them airborne.

But as to World War II Japamnese carriers, I never saw any with the inclined ramp.

I'm wondering if the photos you are referring to show the carriers with the elevated flight decks. These reveal a bunch of daylight between the flight deck and the main deck below. Can you post a photo?

Bob Wright
 
  • Like
Reactions: g5m

Bob Wright

Hawkeye
Joined
Jun 24, 2004
Messages
7,851
Location
Memphis, TN USA
Here's what I'm referring to:


1709423199979.png


Bob Wright
 

Attachments

  • download.jpg
    download.jpg
    5.8 KB · Views: 15

woodsy

Blackhawk
Joined
Jan 5, 2012
Messages
974
Location
Seymour, CT
Well, caryc, that article you mentioned pretty much explains it all. I had known about the history of those jets and their carriers, but that article pulls it all together. Thanks.
 

caryc

Hawkeye
Joined
Jan 31, 2004
Messages
8,520
Location
Southern California
The British Harrier could not take off vertcally with an ordnance load, so their carriers had that ramp to get them airborne.

But as to World War II Japamnese carriers, I never saw any with the inclined ramp.

I'm wondering if the photos you are referring to show the carriers with the elevated flight decks. These reveal a bunch of daylight between the flight deck and the main deck below. Can you post a photo?

Bob Wright
I was wrong, it was a Chinese carrier that I saw pictures of on TV. It's not a raised up ramp, it's built right into the bow.
iUyXOVT.jpg
 

dannyd

Hunter
Joined
Aug 10, 2016
Messages
2,117
Location
Florida
Jump jets like the Harrier AV-8B or F-35, the Soviets and British both used them.

Way cheaper than having a catapult system and easier to repair bomb or missile damage.
 

caryc

Hawkeye
Joined
Jan 31, 2004
Messages
8,520
Location
Southern California
Thanks Jim, I was waiting for your reply. I knew you'd have something to say about it. It looks rather short to me. Can they land a regular fighter jet on that thing and launch it again. It would seem rather expensive to build that thing for only one type of aircraft.
 

dannyd

Hunter
Joined
Aug 10, 2016
Messages
2,117
Location
Florida
Were you on a destroyer?
Nope, not that lucky, a Perry Class Frigate, in March of 1985 we managed to have a major Engine Room fire that almost put us out of commission before even starting our long cruise.

When the Captain asks all personal not actively involved in fighting the fire to go to their abandoned ship stations, you know you maybe in trouble. ;)
 

XUSNORDIE

Single-Sixer
Joined
Jul 29, 2023
Messages
242
Location
Gettysburg PA Area
Pulled alongside a UK Carrier in the IO in late 80s...had the ski jump and it was unusual to see. It was smaller, and of course only had helos and harriers (as I recall). We don't need that stuff....our Gator Navy can handle it just as well.
 
Joined
Nov 2, 2012
Messages
358
Location
Western Maine
Here's what I'm referring to:


View attachment 41061

Bob Wright
Most of those with the open bow under the flightdeck started life as cruisers or some other large ship. Even the first few US carriers were like that.

If ou want to read up on interesting carriers read about the USS Sable and USS Wolverine, two sidewheeler carriers.

 
Last edited:
Top